Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The biggest question for the Panthers.


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, trueblade said:

It's within the range of outcomes for him, but it's also a big ask of a rookie. He could be a LT this year and then kick inside next year if we draft or sign someone.

I really think that is what is going to happen barring injury.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SBBlue said:
11 minutes ago, trueblade said:

It's within the range of outcomes for him, but it's also a big ask of a rookie. He could be a LT this year and then kick inside next year if we draft or sign someone.

I really think that is what is going to happen barring injury.

I agree with you guys. I think the battle in camp here will decide who is playing LT. If anyone has an edge I would say right now its Trenton Scott, just because Rhule seems to like him and he's the most familiar with the system. If Christensen comes into camp and looks good going against our edge rushers then he may be able to win the job.

GIF - I completely agree GIF - Viral Viral Videos

Edited by Michael G
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Michael G said:

I agree with you guys. I think the battle in camp here will decide who is playing LT. If anyone has an edge I would say right now its Trenton Scott, just because Rhule seems to like him and he's the most familiar with the system. If Christensen comes into camp and looks good going against our edge rushers then he may be able to win the job.

 

We had like four or five different guys play left tackle last year.  Scott started like 4 games,  Okung  7 games, and didn't Greg Little actually do a couple?.   Seems like it got so bad we swung Schofieled to tackle at one point.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

We had like four or five different guys play left tackle last year.  Scott started like 4 games,  Okung  7 games, and didn't Greg Little actually do a couple?.   Seems like it got so bad we swung Schofieled to tackle at one point.  

Yeah that's accurate--Scho- was very disappointing. He was supposed to be that versatile guy (Play G or T) with experience who was familiar with Pat Meyer, but he did not play well at all. I think Trenton Scott  was 2nd Best of those guys (Okung was pretty good but couldn't stay on the field b/c of injury). It didn't help any of them that they had Chris Reed beside them (85% of the time anyway). I hope Elf or one of the rookie's is a better option at LG. It will help Scott, Erving, or Christensen a lot I think.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Michael G said:

Yeah that's accurate--Scho- was very disappointing. He was supposed to be that versatile guy (Play G or T) with experience who was familiar with Pat Meyer, but he did not play well at all. I think Trenton Scott  was 2nd Best of those guys (Okung was pretty good but couldn't stay on the field b/c of injury). It didn't help any of them that they had Chris Reed beside them (85% of the time anyway). I hope Elf or one of the rookie's is a better option at LG. It will help Scott, Erving, or Christensen a lot I think.

With the way injuries always batter the line, and based on how bad Elf and Erving appear to be, we at one point may be starting a 3rd round rookie at LT and 6th round rookie at L guard.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Anyone who thinks our biggest question is anything other than "have we solved the QB problem?" is absolutely kidding themselves.

There's a difference between answering the question and getting it right.  A solution has been presented at QB and is currently awaiting peer review.

Several hypotheses are currently being vetted for a starting OL.  No solutions have been presented.  Best answer we've received is "We're gonna try everybody everywhere".  

That is a bigger question than QB.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, trueblade said:

It's within the range of outcomes for him, but it's also a big ask of a rookie. He could be a LT this year and then kick inside next year if we draft or sign someone.

Or the Panthers could do just the opposite, play him inside this year, given him experience, building his confidence, then move him to LT next year.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, SBBlue said:

So does anyone think Christiansen will be our LT?

Just because Christensen played left tackle throughout his career at BYU does not mean he will start there, especially to begin with for the Panthers. It was his explosive pro day numbers that helped attract the Panthers.

At 6-foot-6, 300-pounds, Christensen is an athletic lineman. He posted a 10-foot-4-inch vertical jump, a 4.89 seconds 40-yard dash and a 34-inch vertical leap. His vertical jump was the best recorded by an offensive lineman among available NFL Scouting Combine records. Christensen was also the highest graded tackle in a season ever by PFF (96.0).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...