Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Texans now indicate Deshaun Watson is available for trade


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

     Chuck has been yanking y’all around with this BS through multiple ALTs. The post below was one of the first and 4 months before Sizzle signed up. He was all over the Pats forum saying Cam needed to “subjugate” himself to Belichik. So that fits the pattern shown here. Plenty more proof if he wants to deny it. 

   On 4/7/2020 at 1:03 PM,  TheSpecialJuan said: 

This is a good thing 

And true.

It amazes me how many folks think Hurney is running the show -- couldn't be further from the truth. 

Hurndog doesn't have the authority to pull the trigger on ANYTHING without the approval of Tepper and/or Rhule.

For those of you who may watch Billions...Tepper is Axe...Rhule is Dollar Bill (a portfolio manager with limited trading authority)...Hurndog is a supporting analyst with no trading authority (unless it is co-brokered with Rhule and doesn't exceed Rhule's size limits).

This "strong man" obsession he has is just bizarre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This "strong man" obsession he has is just bizarre.

Remember when I asked if he had been banned for racist remarks before? This is what I meant, and why I asked. One of many. 

RASTAN99

RASTAN99

On the Game Day Roster
If Cam is healthy he's running away with QB1 - starter.

I have my doubts he's healthy for 16 and playoffs if we're lucky but I'm happy we have Stidham as a bu.

I'll take a year or two of Cam, even 80% of Newton with this OL. Another move here or there to offense or defense and we're a top 3 team in the AFC.

We're basically killing time with the best possible option(s) while waiting for our QB of the future.

He's healthy as a horse.

All players are at risk of getting hurt in the course of an NFL season. In my opinion if Cam wins the starting job but isn't able to play a complete season due to a physical problem, it won't because of any legacy foot/shoulder issues, but rather a new injury. I have a hunch that after all the injury misfortune, this pitfall is behind him. (assumes he makes good decisions on sliding, cuts out showboating to eliminate targeting by opposing D, etc)

If BB is able to subjugate Cam and both go all in the ride will be a lot longer than 2 years....it could be a great 5-7 year run. (I was going to say "epic run" but caught myself..."epic" has a whole different connotation with this franchise vs. any other!)

The best possible long-term option might just be on the roster today....gonna be fun to watch!
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

What sort of massage would Panthers signing Watson send to women?

Good one!

All joking aside, if for some insane reason the Texans did reverse course and make him available and another franchise acquired him...

...the acquiring franchise would be putting themselves squarely in the crosshairs of the Cancel Crew/Culture...

...Senators have been removed from office for far less. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, markbm62 said:

I would not mind a player of his caliber at quarterback for us, but I think we need to keep our top picks to keep building the Offensive line.  I’m old so I still believe in having a strong O/D line first and the rest will follow.

It's definitely still important, but this becomes more and more of a QB driven league every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

That's your terminology, not mine.

In the case of Whiny Aaron and the Packers the richest man in the room is Aaron...by a longshot.

You just seem to get off on power/authority. Usually that's held by the wealthiest person but not always.

Players get cut all the time when teams decide they're no longer worth their contracts but let a player angle for more or attempt to use any leverage they may hold in any way and you go on one of your rants. It's bizarre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Have you been able to confirm who reports to whom?

In the Appaloosa Model it looks like this:

         Tepper

Rhule < ^ >  Fitterer

If true, by definition the GM is not "traditional" because "tradition" dictates that GM's hire and manage the Coach.

What say ye?

I say you're predictable 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You just seem to get off on power/authority. Usually that's held by the wealthiest person but not always.

You're entitled to an opinion, it's a free country.

The "power/authority" is determined by the details of the contract both parties agree to.  It is true that I don't like it when whiny bitches who are on track to make $200,000,000+ in a career start pouting over hurt feelings and want to be let out of their contract as such.

 

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Players get cut all the time when teams decide they're no longer worth their contracts but let a player angle for more or attempt to use any leverage they may hold in any way and you go on one of your rants.

A player can only be cut if the contract is the terms of the contract allow the team to do so.  Sometimes there are ramifications in terms of payments owed the player, sometimes not.

If a player believes a contract to be unfair, they shouldn't sign it.  If they sign it, they need to be prepared fulfill it.

If a team conducts themselves outside the boundaries set in the contract, the team should be held accountable...and you can rest assurred the NFLPA makes they are.

It's a free country, players can whine, holdout, quit...no worries here, whatever they want...

...but hurt feeling don't obligate the team to change the terms of the contract.  

That's where we differ, you don't believe in contracts, I do.

It's ok to have differing views...

...understanding right & wrong and believing in the rule of law is important to me...others, not so much.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

What sort of massage would Panthers signing Watson send to women?

... including any women who were harassed by Jerry Richardson that are still employed by the Panthers.

You have to figure there are at least a few, possibly several. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

If it pans out that way, it would probably be better to ride out the season (again) and take a QB early in the draft rather than pay big for a guy who could conceivably not be allowed to play football again. The allegations against Watson, if true, are terrible and should result in him being banned from the sport. In such a case, the team trading for him would be out the draft picks, the opportunities they would have created AND very likely be sitting on contracted dead money against the cap for years to come. 

Yeah, let someone else take a chance on that.

I don't really envision a scenario where we are trading for him if there is question as to his status. We are not describing similar scenarios at all.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

You're entitled to an opinion, it's a free country.

The "power/authority" is determined by the details of the contract both parties agree to.  It is true that I don't like it when whiny bitches who are on track to make $200,000,000+ in a career start pouting over hurt feelings and want to be let out of their contract as such.

 

A player can only be cut if the contract is the terms of the contract allow the team to do so.  Sometimes there are ramifications in terms of payments owed the player, sometimes not.

If a player believes a contract to be unfair, they shouldn't sign it.  If they sign it, they need to be prepared fulfill it.

If a team conducts themselves outside the boundaries set in the contract, the team should be held accountable...and you can rest assurred the NFLPA makes they are.

It's a free country, players can whine, holdout, quit...no worries here, whatever they want...

...but hurt feeling don't obligate the team to change the terms of the contract.  

That's where we differ, you don't believe in contracts, I do.

It's ok to have differing views...

...understanding right & wrong and believing in the rule of law is important to me...others, not so much.  

The NFL has non-guaranteed contracts. They HEAVILY favor the team. You just love watching people having to bend the knee to authority figures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

     Chuck has been yanking y’all around with this BS through multiple ALTs. The post below was one of the first and 4 months before Sizzle signed up. He was all over the Pats forum saying Cam needed to “subjugate” himself to Belichik. So that fits the pattern shown here. Plenty more proof if he wants to deny it. 

   On 4/7/2020 at 1:03 PM,  TheSpecialJuan said: 

This is a good thing 

And true.

It amazes me how many folks think Hurney is running the show -- couldn't be further from the truth. 

Hurndog doesn't have the authority to pull the trigger on ANYTHING without the approval of Tepper and/or Rhule.

For those of you who may watch Billions...Tepper is Axe...Rhule is Dollar Bill (a portfolio manager with limited trading authority)...Hurndog is a supporting analyst with no trading authority (unless it is co-brokered with Rhule and doesn't exceed Rhule's size limits).

110% sizzle is not chuck. hes 10x smarter than old chuckster 

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

For Watson- I didnt want him at the 3 1sts, 2s, players and mid-late haul asking price.  Then 40+ women came with stories, weird sick stories........ Goodell needs to hand down the punishment first, its still very hard to over-look the tiny cloth with flying fluids stories form multiple massage therapists across the states lines. Most of the Houston massage people put him on their "list". 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...