Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Texans now indicate Deshaun Watson is available for trade


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

If a team terminates a contract, the player still gets paid.

Nope. Most fans don't understand this concept. That guaranteed bonus money is already paid out. The only new money a player gets is from being on the roster. Just because the bonus money is prorated across the length of the contract and hits the cap in future years doesn't mean that's when it's actually paid out. Salary, roster bonuses, workout bonuses, escalators, etc. are not paid out if/when the player is released. Signing bonus is the only thing that matters and that was paid out upon signing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Nope. Most fans don't understand this concept. That guaranteed bonus money is already paid out. The only new money a player gets is from being on the roster. Just because the bonus money is prorated across the length of the contract and hits the cap in future years doesn't mean that's when it's actually paid out. Salary, roster bonuses, workout bonuses, escalators, etc. are not paid out if/when the player is released. Signing bonus is the only thing that matters and that was paid out upon signing.

 

It is an over-simplification, but the easiest way to explain it is NFL contracts are like a series of one-year contracts, with the signing bonus attached to the front end of year one, almost as soon as the ink on the contract dries.

People confuse the salary cap mechanics and the contract transactions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sgt Schultz said:

It is an over-simplification, but the easiest way to explain it is NFL contracts are like a series of one-year contracts, with the signing bonus attached to the front end of year one, almost as soon as the ink on the contract dries.

People confuse the salary cap mechanics and the contract transactions. 

Yep. Basically. Like you said, it's an oversimplification, but it's the basic gist of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Philly, Miami and Carolina? 

I don't buy us being in on it at this point. 

Speculation is probably based on the whole "David Tepper will pay any price" thing which turned out to be garbage.

Tepper supposedly wanted Justin Fields too but here we are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't buy us being in on it at this point. 

Speculation is probably based on the whole "David Tepper will pay any price" thing which turned out to be garbage.

Tepper supposedly wanted Justin Fields too but here we are. 

Literally every report about a possible trade has us included in the 2 or 3 teams who have actively inquired about it recently.....so IDK about all that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Nope. Most fans don't understand this concept. That guaranteed bonus money is already paid out. The only new money a player gets is from being on the roster. Just because the bonus money is prorated across the length of the contract and hits the cap in future years doesn't mean that's when it's actually paid out. Salary, roster bonuses, workout bonuses, escalators, etc. are not paid out if/when the player is released. Signing bonus is the only thing that matters and that was paid out upon signing.

 

Exactly as agreed to by the player, his agent, and his lawyer.  

What else do you want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

Literally every report about a possible trade has us included in the 2 or 3 teams who have actively inquired about it recently.....so IDK about all that.

It's been unreliable sources pointing to teams with either a question mark at QB, draft capitol to make the trade, or both. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Exactly as agreed to by the player, his agent, and his lawyer.  

What else do you want?

An acknowledgement that the only avenue a player has is to utilize whatever leverage he may hold. The team will always hold the leverage of being able to terminate the contract. Barking to the media, threatening to hold out, actually holding out, up and retiring like Barry Sanders or Calvin Johnson. That's the only real leverage a player holds yet you act like they've committed this grave dishonor by actually utilizing any of that leverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What are the sources on those reports? Anything credible?

Not being an ass, legit question.

All speculation except for a couple of sources that claim we've called while more reliable sources like Rapoport say nobody's called. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, travisura said:

This feels like an over simplified child-like view. This is completely discounting the aspect of power imbalance and implicit coercion.

Players have agents and lawyers to balance the power and eliminate coercion.  

If you're offered a bad contract, don't sign it.  

If you sign it, be prepared to fulfill you end, if you want to be paid.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Nope. Most fans don't understand this concept. That guaranteed bonus money is already paid out. The only new money a player gets is from being on the roster. Just because the bonus money is prorated across the length of the contract and hits the cap in future years doesn't mean that's when it's actually paid out. Salary, roster bonuses, workout bonuses, escalators, etc. are not paid out if/when the player is released. Signing bonus is the only thing that matters and that was paid out upon signing.

 

Yep, just an accounting trick make it easier to stomach that big lump sum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's true. What have VT and Miami done since they've been in the ACC vs. before they joined the ACC? That was the ACC's big play to become a real player as a football conference. And hell, I ain't even mad about it. Honestly it made all the sense in the world at the time. Those schools made perfect geographical sense for the conference and on paper we're football powerhouses. Unfortunately, they were on the downhill slide. It is what it is. They tried. It didn't work out. Now they're flailing and resorting to trying to add Cal, Stanford, and SMU when those programs are decades removed from being relevant. It's over.
    • Trade Idea: Should Houston Texans Pursue Panthers Defensive Tackle Derrick Brown? Could Derrick Brown go to the Houston Texans in free agency with his rookie contract expiring? https://www.si.com/nfl/texans/news/houston-texans-trade-derrick-brown-carolina-panthers I read this article. Hopefully the front office isn’t crazy enough to even consider something to this extent or hear any nonsense like this. He was the 2nd most tackler last year for the team only behind Luvu who we was unable to re-sign. I haven’t had a lot of second guessing with the three amigos just a couple that I wish we could’ve re-signed.
×
×
  • Create New...