Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who From the Panthers has Potential Trade Value to Improve Other Areas of the Team and/or Acquire Draft Picks?


Seltzer
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, RJK said:

AJ Bouye. Secondary looks much improved making him relatively expendable. After his suspension is up or if a playoff team loses a corner early in the year I bet he could be flipped 

I don't see it... I think the team very much has Bouye in their plans... with a 17 game season and playing against the WR's in the NFC South, he is going to get plenty of playing time IMO.

Although, Myles Hartfield has looked better at nickel than I ever imagined he could be.  Reminds me a little of Munnerlyn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Seltzer said:

I don't see it... I think the team very much has Bouye in their plans... with a 17 game season and playing against the WR's in the NFC South, he is going to get plenty of playing time IMO.

Although, Myles Hartfield has looked better at nickel than I ever imagined he could be.  Reminds me a little of Munnerlyn.

I see more Richard Marshall in Hartsfield than Munnerlyn

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

I see more Richard Marshall in Hartsfield than Munnerlyn

If he could approach either of them it would be a huge win for an undrafted guy.

You're right about body type, I was thinking more of him just being a dog as a slot CB like Munnerlyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Swaggasaurus said:

David Moore, as stated above YGM. It would be tough but YGM has been playing with the 3rd stringers some

Yeah, I'm not saying it's gonna happen but he's the only player I can see him replacing. Same role, age but better ST and if they think he has more potential as a pass rusher that might explain this trade. I've been trying to figure out whose spot he's taking and I can only come up with YGM. Unless they go with 9 DL because they are light at LB which could be possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

David Moore, as stated above YGM. It would be tough but YGM has been playing with the 3rd stringers some

He's been playing with the second and third stringers - I assume to just give him as many reps as possible.

He's too talented to trade away this early. I also think he contributed last year - we've just reinforced the position in the offseason. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

He's been playing with the second and third stringers - I assume to just give him as many reps as possible.

He's too talented to trade away this early. I also think he contributed last year - we've just reinforced the position in the offseason. 

YGM isn't going anywhere.

The Johnson trade was about getting another development 4-3 prototype DE and improving STs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...