Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who From the Panthers has Potential Trade Value to Improve Other Areas of the Team and/or Acquire Draft Picks?


Seltzer
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, RJK said:

AJ Bouye. Secondary looks much improved making him relatively expendable. After his suspension is up or if a playoff team loses a corner early in the year I bet he could be flipped 

I don't see it... I think the team very much has Bouye in their plans... with a 17 game season and playing against the WR's in the NFC South, he is going to get plenty of playing time IMO.

Although, Myles Hartfield has looked better at nickel than I ever imagined he could be.  Reminds me a little of Munnerlyn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Seltzer said:

I don't see it... I think the team very much has Bouye in their plans... with a 17 game season and playing against the WR's in the NFC South, he is going to get plenty of playing time IMO.

Although, Myles Hartfield has looked better at nickel than I ever imagined he could be.  Reminds me a little of Munnerlyn.

I see more Richard Marshall in Hartsfield than Munnerlyn

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

I see more Richard Marshall in Hartsfield than Munnerlyn

If he could approach either of them it would be a huge win for an undrafted guy.

You're right about body type, I was thinking more of him just being a dog as a slot CB like Munnerlyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Swaggasaurus said:

David Moore, as stated above YGM. It would be tough but YGM has been playing with the 3rd stringers some

Yeah, I'm not saying it's gonna happen but he's the only player I can see him replacing. Same role, age but better ST and if they think he has more potential as a pass rusher that might explain this trade. I've been trying to figure out whose spot he's taking and I can only come up with YGM. Unless they go with 9 DL because they are light at LB which could be possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

David Moore, as stated above YGM. It would be tough but YGM has been playing with the 3rd stringers some

He's been playing with the second and third stringers - I assume to just give him as many reps as possible.

He's too talented to trade away this early. I also think he contributed last year - we've just reinforced the position in the offseason. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

He's been playing with the second and third stringers - I assume to just give him as many reps as possible.

He's too talented to trade away this early. I also think he contributed last year - we've just reinforced the position in the offseason. 

YGM isn't going anywhere.

The Johnson trade was about getting another development 4-3 prototype DE and improving STs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...