Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold stat predictions for the season


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, 1usctrojan said:

I don’t care about QB stats - wins count, the only thing that counts.  If Sam doesn’t turn the ball over, moves the chains, gets the ball to his playmakers, who cares if the TDs are passing or rushing.  

Because yards, TD, and turnovers are how we rate QBs. 

If the teams wins a lot, in spite of Sam, like the chiefs did with Smith, then we need to look to upgrade that position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

856 yards

4TDs

7Ints

5Fumbles 3Lost

66% completion

66.7 passer rating

0-4, before being benched for PJ..."All I Do Is Win" Walker

 

Let's be reasonable here, we don't want to give the pj hate train any gas. My standards are a little higher than most because i don't see sam darnold as someone who needs to be coddled, he is a 4 year starter and has all the weapons at his disposal. 

 

33 TDs

13 IN

3,300

25 RYs

 

this is the minimum for me.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 1usctrojan said:

I don’t care about QB stats - wins count, the only thing that counts.  If Sam doesn’t turn the ball over, moves the chains, gets the ball to his playmakers, who cares if the TDs are passing or rushing.  

 

If the huddle can make threads about the stats of the backup qb's, then sam darnold's stats should matter. same energy.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Tinamedina said:

 

Let's be reasonable here, we don't want to give the pj hate train any gas. My standards are a little higher than most because i don't see sam darnold as someone who needs to be coddled, he is a 4 year starter and has all the weapons at his disposal. 

 

33 TDs

13 IN

3,300

25 RYs

 

this is the minimum for me.

I think the real prediction should be his week 1 stats...will he be outperform by a rookie...????

256 yards...our WRs RAC

1 TD 1int...

Pick 6 ended the game...

Edited by CPsinceDay1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...