Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In your opinion, how did we fair in certain areas in comparison to last year?


mbarbour21
 Share

Recommended Posts

These are some issues that I believe we typically had last year and how we faired yesterday in comparison:

- Bridgewater was not making deep throws ↗️(We had one good completion. To be fair, our 0-line is still severely limiting our ability to go deep. I feel like we did see better arm talent though, and it isn't because our QB is unwilling, isn't capable, or is ignoring/not seeing a wide open Moore.)

- No CMC for most of the year ⬆️‼️(This is obviously improved. Maybe a bit too much improved. Most agree we over used CMC and need to find a way to spell him. The season didn't get any shorter, that's for sure.)

- No TE production for the majority of the year 🔂(More of the same. Would have loved to see Tremble get some targets, even if it was from out of the back. Tremble should not come off field for Ricci.)

- Very poor play in the red zone 🔂 (More of the same again. Turnovers, bad throws, getting stuff.....rinse and repeat. Offense did well when they were spread out. Darnold could have crawled in the end zone. Turnover was a stupid fluke play. Hopefully the miscues in the red zone will not be the norm.

- Slye on FGs 🔂 (More of the same yet again. Yes Slye did well for the Texans, but he didn't do well for us. It's very possible he played no better than Santoso if he was still rocking the black and blue.....or the white ice cream uniforms....whatever. In case you have been hiding under a rock, WE PUNTED ON THEIR 33 YARD-LINE.)

- Defense could not execute on 3rd down to save their life ⬆️ (Very much improved! We made them look almost as bad as us on 3rd downs. It was mentioned before somewhere on this site that we would have lost this game last year. This is exactly why we didn't. We got them off the field, and that is refreshing.)

- Defense could not stop the run ⬆️ (I feel like this goes without saying. Last year we would have given up more yards on a single rush TWICE, than we gave up all game. Held them to 45. If this continues and we keep the improved pass rush we are gonna be a force.)

- Raw rookies starting in the secondary ⬆️ (We had a rookie in the secondary, but he def wasn't raw. He gave up that TD late, but that was mostly the result of a perfect pass. They went his way 3 times. Horn balled. Chinn was def an upgrade at the safety position. There just seemed to be one major issue with that completion to Mims. But the unit looked much improved over Jackson/Douglas, Pride, Burris, and Franklin....or whatever group we had most often.

***How do you guys think we faired in the areas we performed poorly in last year?***

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Sam is playing pretty similar to Teddy.   I think that is the plan.  Overall, in preseason and week 1 is basically playing with just about 10 yards of field.   I would expect that to continue. 

The offense I don't think completed a single intermediate pass.  10-20 yards downfield.   He did hit Robby deep...but that was the type deep play Teddy would randomly hit too.  Where the WR was just so wide open he would take it.   Then that one crazy DJ toe tap play. 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I still think Sam is playing pretty similar to Teddy.   I think that is the plan.  Overall, in preseason and week 1 is basically playing with just about 10 yards of field.   I would expect that to continue. 

The offense I don't think completed a single intermediate pass.  10-20 yards downfield.   He did hit Robby deep...but that was the type deep play Teddy would random hit too.  Where the WR was just so wide open he would take it.   Then that one crazy DJ toe tap play. 

 

Toxic Teddy ran the offence the way Brady and Rhule want it to be run - attacking teams horizontally with quick passes to keep the chains moving and providing receivers with YAC opportunities. 

One of two reasons why Bridgewater is no longer here is because he refused to hit the deep shots. He can't make that throw Darnold made to Anderson - that was all arm. Much like the Saints O with Brees, the plan is to consistently hit the short completions then, if you overcompensate to defend that, hit you with the shot play. It's absolutely by design - we'll experience lots of Bridgewater deja vu this year - except Darnold will hit those chunk plays. 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

too. many. fuging. drops. also, when they started creeping back is when i was not seeing cmc involved. We have him, we use him, there's a reason for that. This isn't the NBA, it's the NFL. The main difference in this game than any other last year was CMC and a pass rush. 

Drops are why preseason is important, but people fear getting hurt. You need those reps, not when the regular season starts. a lot of sloppy football across the board yesterday, esp in buffalo. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

I still think Sam is playing pretty similar to Teddy.   I think that is the plan.  Overall, in preseason and week 1 is basically playing with just about 10 yards of field.   I would expect that to continue. 

The offense I don't think completed a single intermediate pass.  10-20 yards downfield.   He did hit Robby deep...but that was the type deep play Teddy would random hit too.  Where the WR was just so wide open he would take it.   Then that one crazy DJ toe tap play. 

 

Do you think that is the plan BECAUSE our offensive line isn't good? Or do you think we would still have the same plan if they were better? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the primary improvements were on the defensive side of the ball which shouldn't be shocking given our considerable investments in the defense since Rhule was hired.

I also agree that so far, the offense basically looks the same as last year with the same issues present with Darnold throwing the ball at a higher velocity than Teddy did. Hopefully as he settles in and gets more comfortable we'll see a more dynamic offense. The offense can't just be feed CMC and rely on the QB simply not to lose the game. There has to be more to it than that, particularly with the WRs we have.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s impossible to make a judgement after week 1. Go back last year to week 1 when we lost to the raiders, Teddy played about the same as Darnold going up against a much more talented team (on paper at least). We lost 30-34 our D got ran over, as of now vs a bad team our defense looked great, our offense looks about the same.

 

To me it seems like the coaches are micromanaging Darnold, they are scared he’s gonna starting throwing picks. That was the least talented most inexperience secondary we will face all season and mostly dinked and dunked, when we should of been attacking down field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Toxic Teddy ran the offence the way Brady and Rhule want it to be run - attacking teams horizontally with quick passes to keep the chains moving and providing receivers with YAC opportunities. 

One of two reasons why Bridgewater is no longer here is because he refused to hit the deep shots. He can't make that throw Darnold made to Anderson - that was all arm. Much like the Saints O with Brees, the plan is to consistently hit the short completions then, if you overcompensate to defend that, hit you with the shot play. It's absolutely by design - we'll experience lots of Bridgewater deja vu this year - except Darnold will hit those chunk plays. 

I mean, Teddy hit them too when they were as wide open as Robbie was.   That was the only time he pulled the trigger deep. 

you have to be able to attack at the intermediate level.  The offense failed to complete a pass there the entire game.  It was largely just attacking within 10 yard downfield. 

From a passing attack perspective, it was very similar to Teddy IMO.   Which is fine week 1 for Sam.  But we will have to get better.  Especially vs better teams.  Especially the 10-20 range downfield.  Which we haven't shown yet in preseason or week 1 we can really do that.   

The intermediate throws will be what makes or breaks it for Darnold IMO.  That's where it gets hard for him. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

Do you think that is the plan BECAUSE our offensive line isn't good? Or do you think we would still have the same plan if they were better? 

you don't need crazy time to attack 10-20 yards downfield.  

We didn't complete one Sunday.  I think Sam had 1 in the preseason.  And reports out of camp were repeatedly that Sam was going short and it stuck out.   I would assume Sam is just being coached to do that for the time being.  

That was Teddy's DNA. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Setting aside the “deep throws”, the medium and short throws had more zip and urgency than Teddy’s. Teddy’s inability to throw deep wasn’t the only problem, it was his timid decision making and floaters at all levels, as well as throws that were technically catchable but often behind, low or otherwise not accurate.  Darnold had none of those problems outside two or three bad passes. QB has been significantly upgraded this season, based on this game and the preseason game. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Setting aside the “deep throws”, the medium and short throws had more zip and urgency than Teddy’s. Teddy’s inability to throw deep wasn’t the only problem, it was his timid decision making and floaters at all levels, as well as throws that were technically catchable but often behind, low or otherwise not accurate.  Darnold had none of those problems outside two or three bad passes. QB has been significantly upgraded this season, based on this game and the preseason game. 

Yeah if Darnold settles into the offense nicely like I think he will, we may have our QB situation solved for a while.  Still need significant investment in the o line though. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Setting aside the “deep throws”, the medium and short throws had more zip and urgency than Teddy’s. Teddy’s inability to throw deep wasn’t the only problem, it was his timid decision making and floaters at all levels, as well as throws that were technically catchable but often behind, low or otherwise not accurate.  Darnold had none of those problems outside two or three bad passes. QB has been significantly upgraded this season, based on this game and the preseason game. 

yeah, see, I just can't get down with stuff like that.  QB has been significantly upgraded?  I mean, we can't actually declare that.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

I mean, Teddy hit them too when they were as wide open as Robbie was.   That was the only time he pulled the trigger deep. 

you have to be able to attack at the intermediate level.  The offense failed to complete a pass there the entire game.  It was largely just attacking within 10 yard downfield. 

From a passing attack perspective, it was very similar to Teddy IMO.   Which is fine week 1 for Sam.  But we will have to get better.  Especially vs better teams.  Especially the 10-20 range downfield.  Which we haven't shown yet in preseason or week 1 we can really do that.   

The intermediate throws will be what makes or breaks it for Darnold IMO.  That's where it gets hard for him. 

Bridgewater can't make that throw.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Duffy:  (Scheme fit)  Player Summary: This fifth year Tackle will be looking to start for his third full season. He has a thick base, and a tight yet chunky midsection, carrying more of a Guards frame. He plays with a fast twitch using his quick feet, making him quick off the snap, fast to the 2nd level, showing good recovery potential. His foot movement bolsters his sturdy lower body which he uses to drive defenders out of their gaps or effectively turn them, as well as stalemating some of the stronger lineman. Additionally, it allows him to quickly arrive and seal a pull or trap. On second level blocks he is dangerous, once he lays his body on the defender, they are rendered ineffective. In zone blocks, he quickly crosses the defenders’ shoulders and can kick out with relative ease. Christian plays with fire and pride in pass pro, competing hard to the whistle. He possesses a solid Anchor that holds up when he is out maneuvered and stands firm against bull rushes holding up with formidable leverage.   His slow turn ability in pass pro, allows rushers to arc to the QB. This also affects blitzers or delayed rushers coming from either side as he struggles to pick up the second rusher, opening a quick path to the backfield. He struggles to adjust to defenders throughout the game, causing mistakes to constantly repeat. His biggest weakness is with UOH, and wide hand placement. This affects EVERY facet of his game. On run plays and screens, while he is quick to the defender and provides a successful initial pop, it is often negated by his ability to maintain the block, allowing LB’s to fight off blocks before the ball carrier arrives. In pass pro, he is a decently executed move away from giving up his outside shoulder exposing a short path to the QB, and loss of the ability to mirror.  Scheme Fit: Zone Scheme with quick passes in an RPO/Possession, or heavy run Offense   Dyson Jr. (small school sleeper)     
    • That Lawrence draft was suppose to be great. He is the only QB from the 1st still with his team before the rookie contracts are even over.  I definitely wouldn’t want Bo Nix, Penix has injury flags and is old, Daniels didn’t look great into year 5, JJ wasn’t asked to do much in that offense. These guys are far from being flawless prospects. Let’s see how they turn out. 
    • n the ever-evolving landscape of health and wellness, the ketogenic diet has emerged as a popular choice for those seeking to shed excess pounds and improve overall well-being. As people strive to adhere to this low-carb, high-fat regimen, they often explore various supplements to enhance their journey. One such product gaining attention is OEM Keto Gummies in the UK. In this article, we delve into the intricacies of these gummies, exploring their ingredients, benefits, and potential drawbacks. What Are OEM Keto Gummies United Kingdom?                                      Click Here To Buy Now OEM Keto Gummies United Kingdom are a dietary supplement designed to support individuals following a ketogenic diet. These gummies are formulated to provide the body with exogenous ketones, which can help jumpstart ketosis—a metabolic state where the body burns fat for fuel instead of carbohydrates. Unlike traditional gummy candies, OEM Keto Gummies United Kingdom are sugar-free and contain a blend of natural ingredients that are believed to promote ketosis and overall well-being. They are marketed as an easy and enjoyable alternative to traditional keto supplements like pills or powders. In recent years, the ketogenic diet has gained immense popularity for its potential health benefits and weight loss effects. Alongside this trend, a plethora of keto supplements has flooded the market, promising to enhance the diet's results.                                         Click Here To Buy Now OEM Keto Gummies' Advantages: Research indicates that berberine may assist with the following, adding to the enormous and exceptional advantages of Oem Keto Gummies . Promote Heart Prosperity: Research has demonstrated that berberine can promote cardiovascular prosperity by lowering cholesterol, reducing circulatory strain, and improving glucose regulation. Advanced Stomach-related Prosperity: By altering microscopic organisms in the gastrointestinal system, lowering discomfort, and promoting stomach-related capacity, berberine may contribute to the growth of a robust stomach microbiota. What Are The OemKeto Gummies United kingdom Ingredients?‍ As referred toabove, Oem Keto Gummies United kingdom pills are a blend of naturalelements which might be efficient in starting up wholesome weightreduction within the body. Let’s now discuss each of theingredients and the health houses that they possess: Official Website: - https://timesnewscorp.com/oem-keto-gummies-uk-buy/ https://medium.com/@oemketogummiesuk/oem-keto-gummies-australia-uk-0fa2cdc39a71              
×
×
  • Create New...