Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is this accurate?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

I think he is overconfident in his ability to develop players.  Some guys just are who they are, and Irving and Elflein are those type of guys.

I'm not sure that those are the guys they are developing.  Those two are place holders in my estimate. Not very good ones but pickins are slim right now.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not sure that those are the guys they are developing.  Those two are place holders in my estimate. Not very good ones but pickins are slim right now.

Yeah, but that's my point.  He still views those guys as developmental prospects, imo.  I think he views a lot of players through the lens of untapped potential, and he thinks he can get it out of them even if no one else has.  But, I agree, they are place holders, I just think he believes he can turn them into more while they're here.  I also think in regards to the OL, Fitterer's influence is evident too, because Seattle had Wilson playing behind converted OLinemen and other filler for the vast majority of his tenure there since being drafted.  I think Fitt views OL as a lower priority position group so they can invest more heavily in playmaking and defense, or at least that's how Seattle appeared to operate while he was there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

This^ It doesn't matter who you target its who you end up with.  If your coaching is worth a damn you will make do.

I always laugh at those that say they've ignored the o-line and more specifically the LT.  They haven't ignored it, they are throwing whoever they can find worth a damn at it since Rhule got here.  But you see the problem is this team needed so much more than the LT position addressed.

I would love to see a list of these players that are out there just dying on the vine everyone laments about. Those folks act like its raining All-Pro LT's and our front office is standing outside with an umbrella. 

As for the draft, it just didn't fall our way on that front.  We are too depleted of talent to give up more picks for a chance on just one position.  We didn’t have that luxury this year.   We still need more draft picks for the upcoming draft by the way. 

So fo the TL/dr crowed, we are not where you think we are in this rebuild.

Could you imagine all the damage to property if it was raining all pro LT's? 😁

I don't know if the draft didn't fall the way the FO wanted or not. To me, it seems they valued certain players more than others. That's true for every team though. I said during the draft I would have taken Slater over Horn. That's personal preference though. The FO valued Horn more than Slater and that's who they drafted.

As for the rebuild, it's year two. There is still a long way to go before the team is ready to compete.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Yeah, but that's my point.  He still views those guys as developmental prospects, imo.  I think he views a lot of players through the lens of untapped potential, and he thinks he can get it out of them even if no one else has.  But, I agree, they are place holders, I just think he believes he can turn them into more while they're here.  I also think in regards to the OL, Fitterer's influence is evident too, because Seattle had Wilson playing behind converted OLinemen and other filler for the vast majority of his tenure there since being drafted.  I think Fitt views OL as a lower priority position group so they can invest more heavily in playmaking and defense, or at least that's how Seattle appeared to operate while he was there.

Maybe, of course all coaches believe they can get more out of a player.  I just think it comes down to getting some vets on the line for now because that is really the only option for now. 

I'm not ready to say they don't prioritize the oline or value it.  They just have way to many holes on this team and you can't fill them all in one or two drafts.  I'm going to let it play out before I make my final conclusions. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, pantherj said:

Going into the draft most Huddlers thought we were going to take Slater. This was kind of a no brainer given our o-line situation. Stunningly we took Horn with only a few Huddlers thinking that was going to happen.

I'm an o-line is more important than CB guy.

Rhule has a plan for the o-line, but I'm not crazy about it. CMC has been told to keep an eye on the A and B gaps on passing key passing downs and pick up anyone busting through wearing the wrong color. On the pass play to Robby for a TD CMC did as he was told and blocked an enormous JETS pass rusher to give Darnold time. Rhule was beaming afterwards and kept repeating to anyone who would listen that it was CMC's best play of the game.

The problem with using CMC beside Darnold for pass protecting is that he ends up getting beat up fighting for dear life against monstrous pass rushers. This could lead to a CMC injury, but we're running out of options for what to do to help the o-line.

That's the RBs job on passing downs... its why they don't trust Hubbard atm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nobody deliberately signs bad players.

True, but we all know that person who invites you over for a cookout and tries to serve you eye of round steaks. They don't mean to serve you inedible food, they just don't know what is good and just shop by price.

There's apparently a fine art of selecting linemen and we aren't showing much talent in that art.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The panthers are currently 3rd in the league in dead cap and 2nd in the league in available cap, and lead the league when combining dead cap with available cap. We are still only 1 year removed from Hurney and the Tahir Whitehead level of offseason acquisitions. I think fixing every single position group is an unreasonable expectation with these current cap limitations.

I also don't think Rhule's expectations of the players on the roster rising to his expectations of winning is unreasonable. The Jets have an excellent d line and so do we. Our line significantly outperformed theirs, and I think we are more middle of the pack in olines league wide.

Considering where we were going into the 2020 off season, and combining the fact that we are doing this with limited cap space, I think we have made some fantastic lemonade with the lemons Hurney left us. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

Slater wouldn't have been a reach. By most accounts he was 1B to Sewell's 1A in the draft and considered on a higher level than the other OT prospects.

He was a reach in the eyes of our football guys who get paid make decisions. 

End of story. 

 

Disagree all you want. 

Edited by pantherclaw
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, AU-panther said:

I’m not sure 2 games counts as statistically compelling.

Even with all of the pressure that Tampa bay got on Mahomes  he was still often able to buy time and get good passes off, just so happened his receivers were still covered.

 

How about the majority of the seasons Cam was here? Did you forget why his injuries started piling up in the place first? 

The argument against this is mind blowing. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record i have no issue with them taking Horn. It was AFTER they took him when they said they didnt value in other linemen in the draft that much and took other players. And the guys they did take are on the bench because supposedly are not better than the trash they signed in FA. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...