Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Blessing in disguise


SmittysLawnGuy
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Ok so I'm trying to make cupcakes out of cauliflower here but hear me out. At first we sputtered without CMC. Once Sam knew his baby blanket got cooked to ash he manned up an started making down field plays. I actually believe this could be exactly what we needed. Mind you he needs to figure it out pretty quickly but when Mc is your 1st 2nd and 3rd option how are you growing? By the time CM gets back this guy might be reading D's. See those early wide open receivers down field? He didn't cause guess who he wanted to throw to? May cost us a game or two but it may be well worth it come January.

And if you noticed while looking more downfield the already garbage oline got exposed even more an Darnold took some hits.

This is going to be bad imo, the oline simply isn’t built to withstand the loss of cmc. It’s barley built to handle games with the best rb in the league.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Losing CMC is bad news for the Panthers and Darnold.   It is what it is.  

Losing CMC changes what defenses are comfortable with….and we saw last night they get a lot more aggressive coming at Sam with the CMC checkdown off the table.

and we dodged a lot of bullets last night that those Sam fumbles bounced our way.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, top dawg said:

You already saw them get Tremble more involved.

This offense can be much more. CMC's hammy will just force their hand. 

I was very happy to see that.  

How about Erickson of all people making plays?

Last week it was Zylstra.

It's like Sam is deciding which "no-name" gets to shine each week.    LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, CRA said:

Losing CMC is bad news for the Panthers and Darnold.   It is what it is.  

Losing CMC changes what defenses are comfortable with….and we saw last night they get a lot more aggressive coming at Sam with the CMC checkdown off the table.

and we dodged a lot of bullets last night that those Sam fumbles bounced our way.   

yep.   I think Brady needs to create a gameplan that involves a TON of Bootlegs and Rollouts for Sam JUST TO GET HIM THE F AWAY from that sieve called the Panthers O-Line so he can make a play and not get killed.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some good, some bad. 

The good. We are not a SB team (this year) so seeing what Darnold can do for the future is huge. If he is solid this year, no matter the record, then we sign him long term. We'll also have other options to relying on CMC for everything so when he comes back he's another asset, not the main asset.

The bad. Along with CMC, the Horn injury sucks as this Defense was looking legit long term shut down. In time, teams will find our holes. The O-line better get it's stuff together real fast which we all don't believe is ready to do that.

Possibility of using DJ Moore in a hybrid role and getting Shi Smith involved for the shifty routes out of the back field could be interesting. Throwing down field more will loosen up the box and help the running game, like they did in the 2nd half. O-line will need to be better.

This could also open up the 2 TE sets as Tremble looked real good.All this helps even if we split the games until CMC comes back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Ok so I'm trying to make cupcakes out of cauliflower here but hear me out. At first we sputtered without CMC. Once Sam knew his baby blanket got cooked to ash he manned up an started making down field plays. I actually believe this could be exactly what we needed. Mind you he needs to figure it out pretty quickly but when Mc is your 1st 2nd and 3rd option how are you growing? By the time CM gets back this guy might be reading D's. See those early wide open receivers down field? He didn't cause guess who he wanted to throw to? May cost us a game or two but it may be well worth it come January.

Still tastes like cauliflower.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

and we dodged a lot of bullets last night that those Sam fumbles bounced our way.   

Like a dropped int, it doesn't count.  No turnovers last night, zero.  Sam has played 3 games, 1 int, 1 fumble.  Fewer turnovers than many elite QBs while throwing for ~300 yards a game.

OL had its worst game to date last night too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Like a dropped int, it doesn't count.  No turnovers last night, zero.  Sam has played 3 games, 1 int, 1 fumble.  Fewer turnovers than many elite QBs while throwing for ~300 yards a game.

OL had its worst game to date last night too.  

It’s the whole law of averages aspect.  If you put the ball on the ground a lot….it’s a problem.  Because it’s not always going to bounce your way. 

Ball security and bad decisions are literally the Sam Darnold knocks.  Always have been.  He consistently does it.   Ball security.   USC, NY and to date here.

and your numbers are off.   He doesn’t have 1 fumble on the season.  He has 4 in 3 games.  He had 2 last night, both in Carolina territory.   

fumbles and fumbles lost are two different stats. 

I’ll put the 2nd on Rhule.  Was stupid to ask Sam to attempt that drive given how things were unfolding.  Could see that fumble coming a mile away.  The first is just poor pocket awareness and ball security.  You got to feel that, protect the ball and move in the pocket better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

and your numbers are off.   He doesn’t have 1 fumble on the season.  He has 4 in 3 games.  He had 2 last night, both in Carolina territory.   

 

Whatever.  His turnovers are lower in 3 games than elite QBs have in 2.  EVEN if you add his fumbles that we recovered to his lost fumbles to his ints, and compare that, he still looks better than some elite QBs.

bobsburgers-fox.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...