Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OL looked bad last night


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Moton got beat a lot last nigh too.  The interior, was clearly the worst.    

fair enough, we got our lunch money espcially whipped in the trenches last night

but Erving was especially bad in one on ones this and last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

This 10 day stretch gives the coaching staff a little longer to get Christensen, Brown and Jordan up to speed.

The play of the iOL is unacceptable right now. I can't imagine they're not going to be testing the waters on a lineup change during this break.

These guys would make John Riggins look pedestrian . Our solution? Let's blast Chubba up in there! That'll show em. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmittysLawnGuy said:

These guys would make John Riggins look pedestrian . Our solution? Let's blast Chubba up in there! That'll show em. 

Our line had not made holes up the gut in similar sitations like that all season.  To send a finesse runner up the gut like that when they are clearly in stacked box, goaline D, is the most amateurish call.  I don't know WTF he was thinking.  I thought we got Arnold and Marshall to have big guys to grab it off the shelf in the corners of the EZ.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Our line had not made holes up the gut in similar sitations like that all season.  To send a finesse runner up the gut like that when they are clearly in stacked box, goaline D, is the most amateurish call.  I don't know WTF he was thinking.  I thought we got Arnold and Marshall to have big guys to grab it off the shelf in the corners of the EZ.  

Sadly Arnold doesn't strike me as a high-pointer. I thought that was what we were getting, but he's a finesse TE who plays smaller than his listed size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bartin said:

Linderbaum is my current draft crush. Would love Neal but I feel like there is almost no chance we will be in a position to draft him. We should seriously just use every pick we have on OL and if just 2 pan out as good starters I'll consider it success. Just go full on shotgun style.

Can he change his name to Fenderbaum?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Outside of Moton....NOBODY on this line is a legit starter or above a backup role. Thats just the truth and it's gonna continue to unravel over the course of the season. Im just hopin Darnold can stay healthy.

Moton didn't look like a legit starter for a lot of the game either. That game was just an all around bad performance by the Oline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should be the draft under Rhule that we invest in the interior. Our short yardage run game is poor, we been stopped several times this year with a yard or two to gain. The inconsistent oline play IMO is a major reason why the offense tends to have lulls throughout the game, which allows the opposition to creep back in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
    • Well I guess he should stop playing football. This was his defining moment and chance to prove he was generational and he failed. What a waste of football life..
×
×
  • Create New...