Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm pretty sure both CMC and Horns injuries are due to new field


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Snake said:

I know we all have been digesting losing two key players today but no one has really talked about this. Studies have shown both hamstring and foot injuries happen more on artificial turf than natural. I understand Teppers want to change because of many factors but he might have just caused us to see increased injuries as well as being really poor for the environment as well. Either way I just wanted to open a discussion about this. 

Yes, a certain detail slipped your mind but you and everyone else seems to be ignoring the short 'week' for influencing at least CMC's injury. Maybe Burris too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too would prefer natural grass but "turf" has come a long, long way and the best surfaces offer excellent and safe playing conditions day-in, day-out.

Here's a great video about the surface put in by the Texas Rangers...

...I'd have to believe the football people Tepper put in control of this decision selected a system equal to or better than what the Rangers installed.  

Maybe @Carolina Panthers can confirm what was chosen?

 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I too would prefer natural grass but "turf" has come a long, long way and the best surfaces offer excellent and safe playing conditions day-in, day-out.

Here's a great video about the surface put in by the Texas Rangers...

...I'd have to believe the football people Tepper put in control of this decision selected a system equal to or better than what the Rangers installed.  

Maybe @Carolina Panthers can confirm what was chosen?

 

Or Google can tell you. 

It's field turf. Houston used Hellas matrix turf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

Or Google can tell you. 

It's field turf. Houston used Hellas matrix turf

Good catch.

Last time I looked the info on what brand of turf the Panthers used had not been released...

...pretty interesting reading on their website -- lots of studies and all seem to show FieldTurf provides reduced levels of injury vs. natural grass -- the Appaloosa Model at work:

https://fieldturf.com/en/why-fieldturf/proven-safety/

image.thumb.png.9a93aa6734caa89bc9176c8e1bb051fa.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Valid points.  This article to me explained why they might take the chance with 2 proven veteran Guards and focus limited resources elsewhere.  If you sign a free agent, you spend $10m more than you are paying Corbett and Christensen.  If you draft a C, you have a rookie QB on the LOS in front of Bryce.  Maybe this is their only practical option, since there were many other needs that could not be staffed by currently rostered vets or rookies.  For example, they wanted a "type" at RB.  I said it before--if you look at RB and say, "Chuba had 900 yards behind a bad line!" that would be a great point.  However, he was very weak as a pass catcher and pass blocker when he arrived--he has shown promise as a pass catcher and some growth as a pass blocker.  In 2023, one site rated him the 25th best overall RB in the NFL among the top 72 "starters."  https://www.nfl.com/news/rb-index-ranking-all-72-starting-running-backs-from-the-2023-nfl-season Brooks is elite at Running, receiving, and is good at blocking.  We are better, and the pass catching with his YAC keeps defenses more honest that Chuba did.  How many sacks came after Chuba missed his block?  I dunno, but I saw it more than a few times.  We could not bring in a TE to find a weapon for Bryce.  We had to draft one.  So we had to draft WR, RB, and TE because we had no real options.  So if you look at the big picture, based on the information in the article as foundational knowledge of the C position, the fact that Corbett has never played center is not as important as his ability to play it.  But yes, it is not a given and it is risky--but it is one of the few positions we could upgrade (since we signed 2 stud Gs) with players already on the roster.  It is not ideal, but rebuilding a team with so many holes is impossible in one offseason.  When you laid out the options at every position and looked at the available cap room, this is probably the best option for the Panthers so they can address other needs where there are no options on the roster.
    • Yeah, I'm with you here. Nothing is 100% but so far I've been impressed by our new leaders. I thought the draft moves were great. I can't believe we got a 2nd next season and still got our targets with our first 2 picks. That was badass. Morgan is a dawg too. We can't forget that. Just look at those eyes. Morgan is intense.  
×
×
  • Create New...