Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brett Kollman: Panthers defence breakdown

OldhamA

By OldhamA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted

I love it.  Amazing.  Our D is such a damn problem.  Like he said, even if we only end up at 80% of what its been so far, for the rest of the season, itll still be an historically good defense.  

And the scary thing for the rest of the league is.....we're just getting started.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Actionman0z said:

Bro used a whole tree in that drink, and hopefully didn’t cue Kellon Mond into how to attack us. 
 

what you are seeing is the joy of being multiple with the same personnel. 

Why would Kellen Mond be playing QB against us?  Cousins is having the best start to a season in his career....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Actionman0z said:

Kellen Moore. Their OC. My bad 

Ahhhh OK.  Gotcha.  Well yeah....but you have to think if this guy sees this, then NFL coaches who are paid to do this type of thing also see it.  You can know its coming all day long, the hard part is stopping it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigdavis Rising Star

bigdavis

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, joemac said:

Ahhhh OK.  Gotcha.  Well yeah....but you have to think if this guy sees this, then NFL coaches who are paid to do this type of thing also see it.  You can know its coming all day long, the hard part is stopping it. 

I doubt opposing OCs haven't already seen all this.  But, as you correctly conclude, hard to stop it.

That's because the direction of our rush is so well disguised at the LOS.  They can't for a certainty expect any D formation will result in any defined rush pattern.

There are 2 wonderful parts to this:

1) Snow himself couldn't pull this off, until he had assembled the individual talents (fast, versatile, teachable, aggressive) to play all these interchangeable roles.  Now he does, and unless other teams match the personnel attributes, they can't copy it.  Maybe it can be scoffed at as "college," but nobody can figure it out -- or beat it.

2) Just as important, all our guys are young, and this can go on awhile.  These results aren't being produced because we got some old veteran FA that we can only count on for a year.  Snow has redefined football as a team sport.

(and I'm willing to bet that C.J. Henderson will buy into this, and think he's gone to football heaven)

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CanadianCat Veteran

CanadianCat

Posted
Posted

This video really shows me that last years 1st round pick in Brown was critical to the scheme. 

I typically support all our draft choices but I was 1 among the crowd that thought a run stuffing DT that early might not have been the best value. 

Now I see it all come together. I love that this team is thinking long term with team building.

  • Pie 2
  • The D 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

This video really shows me that last years 1st round pick in Brown was critical to the scheme. 

I typically support all our draft choices but I was 1 among the crowd that thought a run stuffing DT that early might not have been the best value. 

Now I see it all come together. I love that this team is thinking long term with team building.

2 things: Roy was taking a triple team on that 1 play to spring Fox. He's not bad for a back up.

2nd, rumor has it that If we hadn't drafted Brown we were looking at CJ. Now we have both!

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...