Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm sorry but this isn't a winning record team.


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Snake said:

We have way more problems than we do solutions this year. We have been hyped all week about being the number 1 defense and a historic defense at that to give up 36 point to a middle of the road team who was on a short week. Sorry guys but this was the reality check and we are still a 8-9 team at best this year. 

This is hilarious. Playing a good Dallas team, in their house, and against questionable officiating, it could have been much worse. Their coaches had a thing or two saved for the 3rd quarter. We are a good to great team. We get Horn and CMC back we will make it in the playoffs and probably win a game. Next year watch out, fix the O-Line and get another line backer and this will be a great team.

Edited by philit99
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

So you want to stand by the statement we will win our division over Tampa? 

Hopefully it comes down to the last three weeks of the season. No matter your outlook now, if you knew that it would come down to the last 3 weeks to win the division, you'd be psyched as hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

You mean the one where it was down by forward process and it was actually a fumble?  How about the 5 neutral zone infractions on Dallas that never got called?  Refs handed Dallas that game on a silver player and I’m proud of our boys, especially Sam for fighting back

 

Edit:  I forgot to mention the horse collar on a sack and three holding calls that were blatantly missed somehow for Dallas

 

You forgot the push off that Cooper had on Melvin on the 3rd down out route. I about ripped my TV off the wall.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snake said:

Hate it all you want but it's reality. Dallas was the bar for our year. Do you really think we beat TB with this Oline? Philly? Vikings? Bills? Yes maybe the Fins and Falcons. 8-9 record isn't horrible but without a offense being able to put up 30 points or a defense that can hold good teams to 21 I just don't see it. 

I can almost guarantee you guys beat Philthy.  Probably N.O. again.  Split with Tampon Bay.  Good chance with Minniesota.

I think Carolina is a 10 win team unless the wheels just flat come off.   Dallas is good, very good.  No shame in the results for you guys.

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jopie87 said:

If they played any of these teams next week (including Eagles who they do), they would be, justifiably, favored.

Eagles

Vikings

Giants

Falcons x2

WFT

Dolphins

 

Patriots and Cardinals are going to be good measuring stick games too.

 

 

Dallas was the measuring stick because they were the best middle of the road team in the NFC. I have no doubt we beat the bottom of our schedule but the Pats and Cardinals are better than Dallas and we don't have it in my opinion. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Le Stranger said:

I can almost guarantee you guys beat Philthy.  Probably N.O. again.  Split with Tampon Bay.  Good chance with Minniesota.

I think Carolina is a 10 win team unless the wheels just flat come off.   Dallas is good, very good.  No shame in the results for you guys.

Dallas is mediocre at best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snake said:

Dallas was the measuring stick because they were the best middle of the road team in the NFC. I have no doubt we beat the bottom of our schedule but the Pats and Cardinals are better than Dallas and we don't have it in my opinion. 

All good, not going to poo on u for having a differing opinion. From what I've seen so far this year, I'd put the Pat's as a little worse than Dallas and the Cardinals I think are a little better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cdparr7 said:

You forgot the push off that Cooper had on Melvin on the 3rd down out route. I about ripped my TV off the wall.

And that, I honestly take this game as a win, I have a Denver fan watching the games with me today and he even mentioned how bad the refs were agains Carolina.  The reason I started counting neutral zone infractions was because he pointed it out.  He has the count at 7 and none called

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snake said:

Dallas was the measuring stick because they were the best middle of the road team in the NFC. I have no doubt we beat the bottom of our schedule but the Pats and Cardinals are better than Dallas and we don't have it in my opinion. 

This is why your point dumb.. That's not a middle of the rode team... Dallas with that Oline those weapons on offense and a above avg. Defense is top 5 to 10 team in this league.. You're stupid to not see that..

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, philit99 said:

This is hilarious. Playing a good Dallas team, in their house, and against questionable officiating, it could have been much worse. Their coaches had a thing or two saved for the 3rd quarter. We are a good to great team. We get Horn and CMC back we will make it in the playoffs and probably win a game. Next year watch out, fix the O-Line and get another line backer and this will be a great team.

Horns done for the season and I don't think CMC was the difference in two TDs. Our Defense poo the bed like almost all Panthers defenses do when we don't have good offensive play. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

So you want to stand by the statement we will win our division over Tampa? 

Wouldn't be surprised.   They are vulnerable.  We shoulda beat them in game one.  I've seen them up close, this year.  

No guarantees you win but you can.  Yeah, I'll crawfish some.  This was a good team we played today.

I'm not going to belabor the point though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snake said:

Dallas was the measuring stick because they were the best middle of the road team in the NFC. I have no doubt we beat the bottom of our schedule but the Pats and Cardinals are better than Dallas and we don't have it in my opinion. 

Totally disagree. Dallas is one of the top 3 teams in the NFC. Pats are a middle of the road team. Cardinals are questionable to me. It’s all up to Kyler Murray, you let him stretch a play out your doomed. Make him a pocket passer and have to see over the line, you got a shot.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Snake said:

Dallas was the measuring stick because they were the best middle of the road team in the NFC. I have no doubt we beat the bottom of our schedule but the Pats and Cardinals are better than Dallas and we don't have it in my opinion. 

The pats are not that great, Jones will continue to hold them back until he realizes the NFL isnt college and he isnt at Alabama anymore. 

Edited by BlackPanther21_
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...