Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Aren't Christensen & Brown Playing?


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

I get kind of confused about the Brown "conditioning" excuse because..... didn't he play college football each week and 30 pounds heavier at that?  Not only that, he played at Alabama.  I really don't think a program like Alabama would have someone that couldn't play. 

Brady is also older than most draft picks so waiting so long to see what he does in an NFL game makes a bit less sense than a normal draft pick.  We need to see what we got, especially when there are issues happening.

It's hard to trust coaches when we dealt with Rivera keeping people like Norwell on the bench and others because of "they are vets" type nonsense. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

giphy-downsized-large.gif

He sticks to useless vets just like they did.

He also punts from the 33 like fox.

Burns TOs like Ron

Makes inexplicable decisions like a 54 yd fg when pinning them deep was the obvious decision. 

 

So tell which of these statements are incorrect 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zaximus said:

I get kind of confused about the Brown "conditioning" excuse because..... didn't he play college football each week and 30 pounds heavier at that?  Not only that, he played at Alabama.  I really don't think a program like Alabama would have someone that couldn't play. 

You're not facing Aaron Donald and Vita Vea week in and week out in college.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like conditioning and learning the position for Brown.

Christensen I believe we'll see more of and hopefully Erving won't step on his foot.  I think it is evident the Panthers see him as a guard and probably at LG.  Again, he's probably learning the position as a pro and his assignments...interior rookie linemen have to make sure they know the playbook and any protection audibles the QB calls.  The tackles need to as well, but it's a little bit easier as much of the time they are taking care of the DE or blitz coming from a CB if it's a stunt or the DE drops back in coverage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't understand the tone, I gave you my ranking, that's it.  And yes, I still view Lawrence and Kyler are still ahead, in my opinion, which doesn't really mean much lol.  What's this have to do with being a fan ffs? I will say, they are at the end of the list/the more arguable/debatable guys.  So open to debate but it seems you're going straight to the "you're not a fan" debate.  Which is super annoying. Maybe I'd agree Bryce could be ~19-20 on the list if the argument was laid out instead.  His Atlanta game was better than anything they have done in recent memory, but he's had like 10 other games this season.   He is way more inconsistent in my view, due to a few factors... Shotty footwork - he has a shallow lazy step back from gun that puts an OL in an impossible place.  Goes on his toes wayyy to much more my liking. Poor upper body mechanics.  His upper body remains parallel to the LOS and has to perform that rapid twitch/turn motion to get in stance His shallow drops also create a lack of sight lines so he can't layer throws well He's had poor pocket presence - not last week, but it's been a thing   Pure traits standpoint Arm strength is mediocre Mobility is mediocre - can outrun at times but quicker IDLs can catch him Accuracy is a range due to his inconsistency - can be above average to very poor.  His career so far has been pretty bad with intermediates (which again was not the case against ATL) Ball Security Way too sensitive to fumbling Has exhibited very poor decision making, especially in first halves that put the team behind This all does NOT take away that he had a GREAT performance against ATL.  He was able to extend plays, found guys post-route in stride, the XL throw in Q3 was fantastic, a few of the Coker crossers were beauts.  There's no disputing that.   But yeah, in totality, it hasn't looked good but he absolutely cooked last week. Outside of that, he's only had 5 other 250 yard passing games in his entire career.  He stalls on drives, makes annoying turnovers, doesn't see the right guys.  It's okay to both say that and the fact that he balled tf out last week.  I hope he continues so we get better and maybe can make some noise.  Big test on Monday.  
    • Actually that part abuot the Bears is not my opnion. I was watching some show and they were talking about how lucky the Bears have been this year. That's the only reason I brought it up.
×
×
  • Create New...