Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Very Discouraged By Rhule and His Comments After the Game


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

The irony is we just talk about what actually just happened. The real emos are the ones clearly and personally butt hurt about the text from strangers depicting just what actually happened. That's a chaffed ass for sure, projection sumbish

“What actually happened…” lmao

You all just live to bitch and moan. You’re smearing your feces on the walls and acting like you’re some sort of truth tellers, lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry first post...

Things that bothered me as well. 

  • O-Line is trash
  • Darnold having flashbacks (see above)
  • Robby seems to have taken the money and quit.
  • Eagles fans killed us in the cheering department when it counted. Stumbling into this forum I can see why. 
  • Everyone getting their hopes up when we are clearly young and rebuilding, the first 3 games were cupcakes. 
  •  
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Big Johnson Tradez said:

Sorry first post...

Things that bothered me as well. 

  • O-Line is trash
  • Darnold having flashbacks (see above)
  • Robby seems to have taken the money and quit.
  • Eagles fans killed us in the cheering department when it counted. Stumbling into this forum I can see why. 
  • Everyone getting their hopes up when we are clearly young and rebuilding, the first 3 games were cupcakes. 
  •  

Nice first post. I can agree with all of that.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much can Darnold be expected to accomplish when the O-line collapses by the time ball is snapped? I appreciate the organization spending money to bolster our defense but working on all elements of the game is what's needed. And let's face it, Tepper wants a hotrod under center and right now folks we have the eco-friendly Prius. It didn't take long for the tide to change in Charlotte against Darnold, but he never really had an O-line to work with that would help him find true success. Just another case of fool's gold for Darnold.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pantherclaw, I absolutely agree and I see that my post didn't address that aspect at all.  Rhule is all about conservative, predictable play these days and none of that will fool aggressive defenses or inspire break-out offenses.  My main point centers on the failure of the offensive line to consistently protect Darnold thus hampering his ability to execute any given offensive scheme. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone needs to contact the Cardinals, Bills, Browns, Cowboys and Ravens to let them know that establishing a run game isn't important anymore, because they all have more rushing attempts than we do.

The importance of establishing the run is not an isolated philosophy to Rhule or RR and believe it or not, QB's like Brady who can handle carrying that load of a mostly pass offense are rare.



 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Honestly, I think he went to small ball to protect a lead with the injuries we're dealing with, and the offense having no rhythm.  

 

Most of you are just over reacting. 

I have felt like there is an element of this going back a few weeks.  But, even before the rash of injuries, it seems if we have the lead at the half, Rhule feels thats enough of one that we should sit on it and rely on the defense to shut down the opposing offense to preserve the win.  This is also why I think he's conservative about making any adjustments for the second half as well, because if we execute what he plans, we can just chew the clock. 

He has to expect and want more from his offense in the 2nd half.  If we have any semblance of a 3rd quarter the last two weeks, we are 5-0 right now.  It is a fatal flaw that has to be addressed.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I have felt like there is an element of this going back a few weeks.  But, even before the rash of injuries, it seems if we have the lead at the half, Rhule feels thats enough of one that we should sit on it and rely on the defense to shut down the opposing offense to preserve the win.  This is also why I think he's conservative about making any adjustments for the second half as well, because if we execute what he plans, we can just chew the clock. 

He has to expect and want more from his offense in the 2nd half.  If we have any semblance of a 3rd quarter the last two weeks, we are 5-0 right now.  It is a fatal flaw that has to be addressed.

"protect a lead" is keyword for "about to lose the game"

Saw it happen last night too with the Colts who were dominating and then they played for FG with 5 minutes left even though they had 3rd stringers on defense by then and wha had happun wuz....

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

I have felt like there is an element of this going back a few weeks.  But, even before the rash of injuries, it seems if we have the lead at the half, Rhule feels thats enough of one that we should sit on it and rely on the defense to shut down the opposing offense to preserve the win.  Thisbid also why I think he's conservative about making any adjustments for the second half as well, because if we execute what he plans, we can just chew the clock. 

He has to expect and want more from his offense in the 2nd half.  If we have any semblance of a 3rd quarter the last two weeks, we are 5-0 right now.  It is a fatal flaw that has to be addressed.

We all know the O is cold in the 3rd quarter in our games (and 2nd half last game.)   I watched both press conferences, and Rhule said the exact opposite of what your stating.  He talked about needing to play 4 quarters of football and he's spending a lot of time trying to figure out why our 3rd quarter O play has been poor.  

He did NOT say, "Oh, well, I'm just trying to maintain the lead."

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

He did NOT say, "Oh, well, I'm just trying to maintain the lead."

Well they aren't going to saw much to the media you judge based on the actions far far more than any words that come out. All he said was if we have the lead in the 4thQ the defense should hold the lead.

That's true given what we put in the defense btw but no reason that same idea can't still be true while you're trying to score TDs on every possession.

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

We all know the O is cold in the 3rd quarter in our games (and 2nd half last game.)   I watched both press conferences, and Rhule said the exact opposite of what your stating.  He talked about needing to play 4 quarters of football and he's spending a lot of time trying to figure out why our 3rd quarter O play has been poor.  

He did NOT say, "Oh, well, I'm just trying to maintain the lead."

We wish it was just the third quarter but the staff sat on a two point lead well into the fourth. They also clearly wanted to take the ball out of Sam's hands for a time after the second pick. If we had a better oline maybe we could have continued to run the ball successfully with Chuba and win the game but when your qb is reverting back to dumpster status it's not going to end well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

We all know the O is cold in the 3rd quarter in our games (and 2nd half last game.)   I watched both press conferences, and Rhule said the exact opposite of what your stating.  He talked about needing to play 4 quarters of football and he's spending a lot of time trying to figure out why our 3rd quarter O play has been poor.  

He did NOT say, "Oh, well, I'm just trying to maintain the lead."

 

 

Yeah, but you don't know what his idea of "4 quarters of football" is, because he also immediately defended the offense after the game on Sunday and said we moved the ball well and scored a FG in the second half.  That tells me his mindset isn't to go down and score a TD every time we possess the ball in the 2nd half.  There is a clear shift in mentality from the first and second half, offensively and it is because he relies heavily on the defense.

Notice how different the offense looked when Dallas went up 22 points?  Yeah.  I wouldn't read too much into what he says to the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not necessarily trying to be flippant, but Morgan has been telling you what type of team he's trying to to build. So, if you have no idea, you just haven't been listening. @ForJimmy explained it pretty well. But, if you don't believe that, then all you have to do is go back and listen to all of the pressers since Morgan was promoted. Then go back and listen to Dave Canales' pressers since he's been here. Don't forget to listen to the pressers during the draft. You're complaining because you don't agree with the player---or perhaps players that were drafted, the mail one being X. I have consistently said that they should draft the player with the most upside, and that you can't limit your draft based upon perceived limitations (especially perceived limitations based upon some fans) of your QB, particularly if the QB is unproven. X has the most upside, and he needs to be developed for sure, but what you obviously fail to realize is that all of the receivers that we could've picked were "projects," save for maybe Ladd who is smallish, has an injury history, and would have offered some redundancy with what we already have. Most people consider him a slot guy. We already have guys that can play in the slot.  If anything, our choices in the draft probably mean that Mingo is solidly in the long term plans. Whether he succeeds or not will be on him for the most part, as well as the coaches to put him in his best position to succeed. Regarding that, he likely needs to be transitioned to the slot where I'm pretty sure some teams (the Steelers being one of them) would have placed him in had he been available. What we also have is JT Sanders who will be another tough competitor on our side at the catch point. He is big-bodied with high upside, and will provide even another potential beast in the second and third level, and another consistent option for our QB (and any QB).  Morgan and Canales obvious put a premium on receivers that can make tough catches, but that doesn't mean that these guys can't be polished up and coached up where necessary. But even if I look at a worse case scenario, if a wideout can make a tough catch, in the mold of Alshon Jeffrey or even Tee Higgins, then YAC is not as important. But the fact is, that both of our newly drafted wideouts have upside to be YAC monsters. So many people were banging the table for a center. I've said it all the way through: apparently our FO on down believes that AC can be a proficient center. It s not like he hasn't played it before. Moreover, we found out (and some of us already knew) that BC could be a backup. Well that's the plan. Until proven otherwise, I'm going to have faith that Canales and Joe Gilbert (as well as Dan Morgan) know what they're doing in that regard. I could be wrong, but I'm thinking that our O-line should at least be average. We'll find out, but I trust that this is not going to be an excuse for Bryce not to succeed in 2024. You've already seen the investment in the O-line, and in the offensive weapons. But Morgan also invested in the defense. We were decent last season, but inconsistent which lead to us being gashed. But the lack of offense also lead to the defense being gassed, which of course leads to being gashed as well. With the addition of the rookies and the additions of Robinson and Jewell, Fuller and of course Clowney and Wonnum, getting gashed in the run game will hopefully be a thing of the past. But the fact is that you can't fix everything in one offseason. However, if you can't see the plan and the vision, you just don't want to see it.   
    • I see it like this:  Can Coker beat out Terrace Marshall Jr?  Can Pinkey beat out Smith-Marsette (since Legette can return kicks) or Jonathan Mingo? I see Pinkney going to the PS for a season, but he will be pulled up if there is an injury--even if we stay healthy, in 2025, there will probably be two vacancies.  Not sure what Johnson is going to want $$$$, and Thielen will probably be done or cut.  Pinkney could then compete for a job, and with his height, he gives you that Tall red zone WR.   Worth keeping on the PS at the least.
    • I wouldn't you legit need 2-3 seasons too immediate post draft grades are one of the sports medias dumbest creations.
×
×
  • Create New...