Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Film Review of Dallas Game by Brett Kollmann

B_Eazi

By B_Eazi,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

Just a few short days ago, Snow was the darling of the Huddlez. Now he sucks. Seems legit.

 

Huddlerz scouring the interwbz, searching for any iota of negativity to share. Or just making shiit up, or regurgitating others points to keep the negativity flowing. 

 

It's fugging football folks. It's entertainment. Do you demand your money back after a bad movie? Do you complain to the manager if your burger is over cooked? Do you get mad at your mommy if she doesnt' put a smiley face on your grilled cheese?

 

This place has a melt down after the firts negative play in any game. I guess we should expect this after 2 whole losses. smfh

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panther'sBigD Mentor

Panther'sBigD

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, hepcat said:

I don't think he broke the Panthers, I think Phil Snow got cute and put together a shitty gameplan to stop the Cowboys running game. 

Your posts have a legit angry, bitter tone to them, which is equal parts hilarious and concerning. Maybe it's time for a break from the Huddle, for your own sanity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Panther'sBigD said:

Your posts have a legit angry, bitter tone to them, which is equal parts hilarious and concerning. Maybe it's time for a break from the Huddle, for your own sanity?

If I haven't gone insane from watching the Panthers for my entire adult life, I probably never will. Or I've already reached the seventh level of Panthers fan hell. 

Secondly, did you watch the video? Phil Snow called the formation that was working to stop the run the previous 3 games ONE TIME in the 4th quarter. They came out in Nickel and Dime formations all game. No wonder they gave up 250+ on the ground. I don't know if it's because of a lack of LBs or what, but if that's not a shitty gameplan I don't know what is.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
Just now, CanadianCat said:

I agree, Phil got cute. But TBH Dallas has one of the best offensive rosters in the the league. We just got beat. 

I liked the showing against Dallas more than the Eagles game.

I mean we were at home vs a team no where near as good as Dallas...just everything collapsed and fell apart and no leaders like Luke, Cam, Olsen, TD to bring it together. I honestly wonder about the C's on this team TBH. Make a play to stop the bleeding? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CanadianCat Veteran

CanadianCat

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

I liked the showing against Dallas more than the Eagles game.

I mean we were at home vs a team no where near as good as Dallas...just everything collapsed and fell apart and no leaders like Luke, Cam, Olsen, TD to bring it together. I honestly wonder about the C's on this team TBH. Make a play to stop the bleeding? 

Agreed. How much do you put on Shaq being out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
Just now, CanadianCat said:

Agreed. How much do you put on Shaq being out?

Probably did have something to do with some of the pressure not being applied consistently as Reddick was lined up in the middle numerous times whereas he'd usually just be rushing the passer. Reddick should not be playing MLB or even normal LB stuff he's clearly a rusher and that's fine.

Need people who can get to the passer whereas Shaq is a complete LB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

Snow definitely isn't perfect. But I don't think Phil is the one who decided for us to punt on 4th and 2 and let the Eagles get up the field and score a field goal on us. We had many opportunities given to us by the defense but we either let the qb get beat up with odd playcalls or he threw costly interceptions like he has throughout his career. Snow isn't on the list of concerns rn. The coordinator on the other side of the ball though is a different matter entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted

The Dallas game?  Yea, that was on the defense.  You can't give up 36 points and win very often.

The Philly game?  Not on the defense.  21 points is a very reasonable number of points to give up.  I don't care what Rhule said.  The defense was fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, BrianS said:

The Dallas game?  Yea, that was on the defense.  You can't give up 36 points and win very often.

The Philly game?  Not on the defense.  21 points is a very reasonable number of points to give up.  I don't care what Rhule said.  The defense was fine.

And the defense didn't really even give up 21 points. They were put in shitty situations all game and forced two turnovers the offense did NOTHING with.

Defense gave up a FG after a Sam Darnold INT in the 1st Q. 3 points not on them.

They gave up a ridiculous 58 yard FG before halftime. Not much you can do about a great kick from that distance, but alas, this was on the defense. 3 points on the defense.

They gave up a TD after a 53 yard pass broke coverage. They can't hold forever. 7 points definitely on the defense.

They gave up a TD after a blocked punt in horrible field position, and the 2 point conversion. 6 points not on the defense. 2 point conversion on them.

I'd say the defense was directly responsible for giving up 12 points. 1 TD, 1 FG, and a 2 point conversion.

9 of the points were a direct result of an INT and a blocked punt. That ended up being the difference in the game.

Inept offense that turned the ball over 3 times and a blocked punt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DamnItJake!
      EVERYONE UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS IN YOUR PROFILE

      By DamnItJake! · Posted

      The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • KillerKat
       Carolina Hurricanes vs.Vegas Golden Knights  (Stanley Cup Final Game 1) | ESPN on ABC Tuesday, June 2 | 8:00 PM

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...