Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the Darnold Experiment Over?


Castavar
 Share

Recommended Posts

I love when arrogance blows up in people faces, just hate it had to be at the expense of my favorite team.

What a dumb, arrogant, decision to dump Bridgewater after 1 season after orchestrating a offense that saw career seasons from Moore, Anderson, Samuel. 

Now this offense looks like the post Delhomme pre Newton Panthers. 

Rhule and Brady are starting to look like clowns.  

We look like the Jets of the last few seasons but with way more talent. 

PJ Walker's only start last season looks better than what we've been getting from Sam these last couple of weeks.  May need to give it shot otherwise time to start talking draft. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's tough to say how much of the blame is from the drops, Brady, the o-line or Darnold. It seems like some of everything today. 

Get rid of Brady and improve the o-line next year as our biggest priority next year. We're committed to Darnold for 1 more year. 

Just let the season play out and how we adjust for now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

how many drops have we seen today?

Seriously. Darnold shat the bed the last two games, and I’m not saying long term he is the answer, but he absolutely played good enough today. Some really nice passes. 
 

Receivers more than shat the bed today.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said in another thread, he isn't great but isn't terrible. There have been so many drops and Brady loves to abandon the run. If our receivers, more specifically Robby caught passes thrown his way the game would be different. Darnold has been alright today.

Edited by KillerKat
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...