Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers WRs had the 6th most catchable drops by a team the last decade


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

So many people entering with a conclusion they want a proof for, seeking confirming evidence, then shutting it down to do a victory lap.

And Christ almighty there are options here other than "Sam is THE FRANCHISE BABYYYYYYYYY" and "This kid is the root of all the ails us".  Every time someone defends Sam in any way (like saying he doesn't deserve all or even most of the blame for that poo show Sunday) the gang all comes around to lecture about how he does in fact deserve some blame.  I honestly can't remember the last time someone said he didn't deserve any blame.

*edit in anticipation of "we're just talkin' football broski"*

Edited by mwright350
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

You think Sam is at fault for the receivers dropping balls?

All of them? Nope.  

Do I think the balls he threw were a contributing factor on some.  Yes.   Probably 3 of them.  

And I often applied a similar concept when it came to Cam.  Who is tied for my favorite Panther of all time.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

I agree and I am not a Darnold apologist. I think that the guy played a decent game other than the Int.
The timeout was called because Erickson didn’t know where to lineup and the clock was running out. Sam didn’t realize that you cannot call back to back timeouts. 

The main issue with this team is the sub par play of the Oline, followed by Darnolds 3 Ints last week in one game. Other than that he has played almost exactly as I expected that he would.

Sam played terrible at times.  The first play was bad and the offense never really recovered.  It was hard to tell who sucked the most between the bad play of everyone. 

The play calling was confusing and the run game was ignored when it shouldn't have been.  How do you know if it was a bad read, bad play call or blown assignment with all the disfunction going on?  Looks to me that it's all of the above.

Don't get me started on the turnovers.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

All of them? Nope.  

Do I think the balls he threw were a contributing factor on some.  Yes.   Probably 3 of them.  

And I often applied a similar concept when it came to Cam.  Who is tied for my favorite Panther of all time.  
 

 

I'm calling bullshit on that one.  But go ahead with that.  It's crap and you know it.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Sam played terrible at times.  The first play was bad and the offense never really recovered.  It was hard to tell who sucked the most between the bad play of everyone. 

The play calling was confusing and the run game was ignored when it shouldn't have been.  How do you know if it was a bad read, bad play call or blown assignment with all the disfunction going on?  Looks to me that it's all of the above.

Don't get me started on the turnovers.

I know and in my humble opinion Sam was like 6th down on the list of issues from yesterdays game. 
My list would be 

Drops

OC

Defense

Fumbles

HC not communicating to OC to run the ball more

Sam

Edited by Monrowed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

All of them? Nope.  

Do I think the balls he threw were a contributing factor on some.  Yes.   Probably 3 of them.  

And I often applied a similar concept when it came to Cam.  Who is tied for my favorite Panther of all time.  
 

 

You are just biased and blind and that's ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

so what is a 50/50 ball?  Catchable or uncatchable? 

my understanding was it is deemed a catchable ball.  Who wins wouldn’t determine if the ball is catchable would it?

I mean the WRs didn’t have good day.  No doubt.  They didn’t do him any favors.  They need to make some of those.  I just don’t think Sam had a  very good day either despite that.      
 

and specifically Robby.  I can cut DJ a little slack given how well he has played on the year and the load he is carrying in the pass game. 

If you include all of the 50/50 balls in the game yesterday plus all of the ones actually caught plus the ones that were dropped you would have a lot more than 25. There were at least 5 or 6 drops of balls where the receiver was all alone and just dropped it or it bounced off him. With all the tight coverage yesterday just about every ball was a 50/50 ball and we really didn't win many of those.  So I can't  see that they made all of those considered catchable or the number would have been higher.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Monrowed said:

I know and in my humble opinion Sam was like 6th down on the list of issues from yesterdays game. 
My list would be 

Drops

OC

Defense

Fumbles

HC not communicating to OC to run the ball more

Sam

I would put him somewhere in the top 3 until the last drive.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You are just biased and blind and that's ok.

I assure you I am not blind. 

but I have never claimed to be unbiased. 

Sam and Robby catch heat from me pretty easy.  As does Rhule.  I am self aware of that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Sam played terrible at times.  The first play was bad and the offense never really recovered.  It was hard to tell who sucked the most between the bad play of everyone. 

The play calling was confusing and the run game was ignored when it shouldn't have been.  How do you know if it was a bad read, bad play call or blown assignment with all the disfunction going on?  Looks to me that it's all of the above.

Don't get me started on the turnovers.

That's kind of odd to say because the offense came right back and got a TD(Chuba's TD run) immediately after the "D"-fense, in one of its few moments that it actually played defense, forced a turnover. 

If you're saying that the offense still couldn't recover mentally from Sam's INT even after coming right back and getting a TD to even take the lead, then there are bigger problems than just "Sam's Fault" going on here.   🤔

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

I assure you I am not blind. 

but I have never claimed to be unbiased. 

Sam and Robby catch heat from me pretty easy.  As does Rhule.  I am self aware of that.  

I don't believe you are blind either.

I do think you have your mind made up on things and that's okay.

I'm not here to convince you I am right nor should you try to convince me that you're right.

It's called having our own opinions on things and believing they're the correct ones.

Besides, it gives us something to do before watching more of the Carnage next Sunday.   

 

Maybe we should do a Prediction on the number of times Robby drops a pass and see who wins?   LOL!

Edited by glenwo2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenwo2 said:

That's kind of odd to say because the offense came right back and got a TD(Chuba's TD run) immediately after the "D"-fense, in one of its few moments that it actually played defense, forced a turnover. 

If you're saying that the offense still couldn't recover mentally from Sam's INT even after coming right back and getting a TD to even take the lead, then there are bigger problems than just "Sam's Fault" going on here.   🤔

 

I'm saying the offense never really got in a rhythm.  Even on the TD drive it was ugly.  The turnovers deep in our own territory put the defense in bad situations.  It was just a cluster fug all around. 

When Sam was on the mark the receiver would drop it.  Everyone shares blame for the disaster we saw yesterday.  If even a few of those plays were made it would have been an entirely different game despite all of that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenwo2 said:

I don't believe you are blind either.

I do think you have your mind made up on things and that's okay.

I'm not here to convince you I am right nor should you try to convince me that you're right.

It's called having our own opinions on things and believing they're the correct ones.

Besides, it gives us something to do before watching more of the Carnage next Sunday.    LOL!

and I’ll defend DJ Moore pretty quick.   He is now my favorite player on O.  It is what it is. 

But yeah, it’s no secret I had issues coming in this season about Rhule, Sam being THE plan and paying Robby.   And that all factors in how I watch a game.  So I don’t pretend then I am unbiased when they come up…especially when the chips are down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...