Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers WRs had the 6th most catchable drops by a team the last decade


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

So many people entering with a conclusion they want a proof for, seeking confirming evidence, then shutting it down to do a victory lap.

And Christ almighty there are options here other than "Sam is THE FRANCHISE BABYYYYYYYYY" and "This kid is the root of all the ails us".  Every time someone defends Sam in any way (like saying he doesn't deserve all or even most of the blame for that poo show Sunday) the gang all comes around to lecture about how he does in fact deserve some blame.  I honestly can't remember the last time someone said he didn't deserve any blame.

*edit in anticipation of "we're just talkin' football broski"*

Edited by mwright350
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

You think Sam is at fault for the receivers dropping balls?

All of them? Nope.  

Do I think the balls he threw were a contributing factor on some.  Yes.   Probably 3 of them.  

And I often applied a similar concept when it came to Cam.  Who is tied for my favorite Panther of all time.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

I agree and I am not a Darnold apologist. I think that the guy played a decent game other than the Int.
The timeout was called because Erickson didn’t know where to lineup and the clock was running out. Sam didn’t realize that you cannot call back to back timeouts. 

The main issue with this team is the sub par play of the Oline, followed by Darnolds 3 Ints last week in one game. Other than that he has played almost exactly as I expected that he would.

Sam played terrible at times.  The first play was bad and the offense never really recovered.  It was hard to tell who sucked the most between the bad play of everyone. 

The play calling was confusing and the run game was ignored when it shouldn't have been.  How do you know if it was a bad read, bad play call or blown assignment with all the disfunction going on?  Looks to me that it's all of the above.

Don't get me started on the turnovers.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

All of them? Nope.  

Do I think the balls he threw were a contributing factor on some.  Yes.   Probably 3 of them.  

And I often applied a similar concept when it came to Cam.  Who is tied for my favorite Panther of all time.  
 

 

I'm calling bullshit on that one.  But go ahead with that.  It's crap and you know it.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Sam played terrible at times.  The first play was bad and the offense never really recovered.  It was hard to tell who sucked the most between the bad play of everyone. 

The play calling was confusing and the run game was ignored when it shouldn't have been.  How do you know if it was a bad read, bad play call or blown assignment with all the disfunction going on?  Looks to me that it's all of the above.

Don't get me started on the turnovers.

I know and in my humble opinion Sam was like 6th down on the list of issues from yesterdays game. 
My list would be 

Drops

OC

Defense

Fumbles

HC not communicating to OC to run the ball more

Sam

Edited by Monrowed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

All of them? Nope.  

Do I think the balls he threw were a contributing factor on some.  Yes.   Probably 3 of them.  

And I often applied a similar concept when it came to Cam.  Who is tied for my favorite Panther of all time.  
 

 

You are just biased and blind and that's ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

so what is a 50/50 ball?  Catchable or uncatchable? 

my understanding was it is deemed a catchable ball.  Who wins wouldn’t determine if the ball is catchable would it?

I mean the WRs didn’t have good day.  No doubt.  They didn’t do him any favors.  They need to make some of those.  I just don’t think Sam had a  very good day either despite that.      
 

and specifically Robby.  I can cut DJ a little slack given how well he has played on the year and the load he is carrying in the pass game. 

If you include all of the 50/50 balls in the game yesterday plus all of the ones actually caught plus the ones that were dropped you would have a lot more than 25. There were at least 5 or 6 drops of balls where the receiver was all alone and just dropped it or it bounced off him. With all the tight coverage yesterday just about every ball was a 50/50 ball and we really didn't win many of those.  So I can't  see that they made all of those considered catchable or the number would have been higher.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Monrowed said:

I know and in my humble opinion Sam was like 6th down on the list of issues from yesterdays game. 
My list would be 

Drops

OC

Defense

Fumbles

HC not communicating to OC to run the ball more

Sam

I would put him somewhere in the top 3 until the last drive.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You are just biased and blind and that's ok.

I assure you I am not blind. 

but I have never claimed to be unbiased. 

Sam and Robby catch heat from me pretty easy.  As does Rhule.  I am self aware of that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Sam played terrible at times.  The first play was bad and the offense never really recovered.  It was hard to tell who sucked the most between the bad play of everyone. 

The play calling was confusing and the run game was ignored when it shouldn't have been.  How do you know if it was a bad read, bad play call or blown assignment with all the disfunction going on?  Looks to me that it's all of the above.

Don't get me started on the turnovers.

That's kind of odd to say because the offense came right back and got a TD(Chuba's TD run) immediately after the "D"-fense, in one of its few moments that it actually played defense, forced a turnover. 

If you're saying that the offense still couldn't recover mentally from Sam's INT even after coming right back and getting a TD to even take the lead, then there are bigger problems than just "Sam's Fault" going on here.   🤔

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

I assure you I am not blind. 

but I have never claimed to be unbiased. 

Sam and Robby catch heat from me pretty easy.  As does Rhule.  I am self aware of that.  

I don't believe you are blind either.

I do think you have your mind made up on things and that's okay.

I'm not here to convince you I am right nor should you try to convince me that you're right.

It's called having our own opinions on things and believing they're the correct ones.

Besides, it gives us something to do before watching more of the Carnage next Sunday.   

 

Maybe we should do a Prediction on the number of times Robby drops a pass and see who wins?   LOL!

Edited by glenwo2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenwo2 said:

That's kind of odd to say because the offense came right back and got a TD(Chuba's TD run) immediately after the "D"-fense, in one of its few moments that it actually played defense, forced a turnover. 

If you're saying that the offense still couldn't recover mentally from Sam's INT even after coming right back and getting a TD to even take the lead, then there are bigger problems than just "Sam's Fault" going on here.   🤔

 

I'm saying the offense never really got in a rhythm.  Even on the TD drive it was ugly.  The turnovers deep in our own territory put the defense in bad situations.  It was just a cluster fug all around. 

When Sam was on the mark the receiver would drop it.  Everyone shares blame for the disaster we saw yesterday.  If even a few of those plays were made it would have been an entirely different game despite all of that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenwo2 said:

I don't believe you are blind either.

I do think you have your mind made up on things and that's okay.

I'm not here to convince you I am right nor should you try to convince me that you're right.

It's called having our own opinions on things and believing they're the correct ones.

Besides, it gives us something to do before watching more of the Carnage next Sunday.    LOL!

and I’ll defend DJ Moore pretty quick.   He is now my favorite player on O.  It is what it is. 

But yeah, it’s no secret I had issues coming in this season about Rhule, Sam being THE plan and paying Robby.   And that all factors in how I watch a game.  So I don’t pretend then I am unbiased when they come up…especially when the chips are down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And there are a lot of teams that fluctuate from year to year.   For example, the Lions disappointed, and the Bears and Pats overachieved.  But your stats demonstrate the point.  At the bottom 10 of the SOS (toughest schedule) for 2025, the Texans and Rams are the only teams to have winning records. In the top 10 of the SOS (weakest schedules) only the Browns and Cowboys had losing records.  So, it seems that if you have a top 10 SOS (toughest), you have an 80% chance of having a losing record.  If you have a top 10 easiest schedule, you have an 80% chance of having a winning record.  I am not seeing your point, based on these charts.  
    • This article (ESPN) got me thinking and I think on paper.  Thought I would share.  This thinking involves realistic cap analysis, needs, the draft, and free agency.  I think it realistically addresses Edge and LB fairly well.  OL (not 2026 so much, but 2027 and beyond looks good).  The free agent S has deep range and coverage skills, something that killed us on third downs last year, imo.  Beyond Edge, LB, S, and OL depth, that is about it.  I took a flyer on DT and WR depth late in the draft, but at CB (Horn, Jackson, Smith-Wade, and Thornton), QB, RB, TE, etc. we are going to rely on undrafted free agents.  No cap room left. EDGE:  In the $7m per year range, the edge from Atlanta Ebiketie got pressure at a high rate in reduced snaps. With Atlanta adding 2 edge rushers as rookies who seemed to do well (Pearce is one of them--*) but he got pressure in limited snaps at a high rate 16.9% (one in eight pass rush).   He is 27 and played in 384 snaps.  PFF Score of 74.9.  had 2 sacks.  If he had a normal workload, based on his limited play, he would have had about 5 to 6 sacks and about 60 pressures.  However, it is likely he would be rotational here, logging about 500 snaps.   A lot of this decision depends on how we feel about Princely.  If they like his development, you probably do not draft an Edge in round 1 or maybe even 2 for several reasons (and many may disagree with this logic, but a good GM has long-term vision):  1. That would give you 3 Edge contracts to negotiate in 3-4 years.  2.  Edges take time to develop.  They would peak around 2028.  The Panthers are in "win now" mode, I think. Mafe (Seahawks, PFF 69.2) is another option, but he is more along the lines of Scourton and Jones II.  He would command a contract in the $10m range. Kwity Paye (Indianapolis, PFF 68.7) He is about 28 and is expected to sign a deal around $18m per season.  I am not that impressed, but he is considered "above average."  I'd rather have Ebiketie from Atlanta for $10m per season less. Center:  The center position in the draft is looking better.  There are some short armed OTs (like Parker, Duke, et al) who will project inside (G,C). Personally, I like the Center position in this draft--let Mays walk.  Re-sign Corbett, and draft a C in round 3.   Linebacker:  I am not sure what we should do here.   I think Morgan will fall in love with Cincinnati's Golday, and we would take him at #51.  Rodriguez (Texas Tech) in round 3 could be a steal.  However, I am not sure that I see value after Styles in round 1.  I think Devin Lloyd will want elite meny and he is not elite--he is good.  He will ask for $15m per season.  Leo Chenel (KC, 75.1 PFF, est. $5m) is a much better option. Safety:  I think Kam Curl would be a great fit here. (Rams, 2 Ints 87 tackles) he is very versatile. Expected to get between $10m and $12m per year, however.  In the draft, I think they like Bud Clark who should be there in round 4.  Are Moehrig, Ransom, and Simmons enough?  Tony Adams (63.7 PFF) a deep safety known for his range.  He is expected to get a 3-year, $20m deal on the market. Based on what I am seeing here and the way I am thinking right now on 2/21, here is what I might do: Free Agency CAP: I am going to assume we can clear about $50m by restructuring the contracts of Horn, Lewis, Hunt, and Brown and cutting AShawn Robinson.  We could (bold move) extend Ickey Ekwonu--considering his situation, it could be beneficial to him long term, and his guaranteed salary could be spread over the next 3 years or so. Re-sign veterans:  OL:  Corbett ($3m), Nijman ($4m), Christensen ($2.5m--2 years $5m), Jake Curhan ($1.4m-2 years, $3m).  BC may be ready around mid season, Curhan has experience at RT and G, and played well.  He has played LT in preseason.  There is NOTHING in free agency at LT--most sucked in 2025 and/or are old.  WR: Jalen Coker ($8m--4 years, $32m), LB: Rozeboom ($3.5--2 years, $7m) Cherelus ($1m)  ST: Isiah Simmons ($1.5m).  TOTAL:  Approx. $25m New Free Agents:  Linebacker:  Leo Chenal (KC, age 26) estimated $5m. Safety:  Tony Adams, (NYJ, age 27)  estimated $7m Edge: Arnold Ebikete (Atl, age 27)  estimated $7m Draft: Round 1:  Cashius Howell, Edge Texas AM (This pick gives the Panthers a situational edge rusher to pair with Princely while Ebikete and Scourton start.  Jones II could be cut to save about $4m in cap room. Round 2: Caleb Tiernan, LT, Northwestern (Good pass protector who needs work in run blocking.  I wanted Golday LB here, but if we sign Chenel, the need is lessened at LB if we re-sign Rozeboom. Tiernan is solid). Round 3:  Jake Slaughter C, Florida (Groom behind Corbett for a while, but Slaughter is an impressive C who should be ready by 2027). Round 4:  Demetrius Crownover, RT Texas AM (This guy can develop as a backup until Moton decides to leave) Round 5:  Aiden Fisher, ILB Indiana (could be a nice fit in this system.  Smart, with special teams ability)' Round 6: Ty Montgomery, WR John Carroll Univ.  (very productive with good size and hands.  a gamble, but worth a sixth) Round 7:  James Thompson Jr.  DT, Illinois (was a beast at the Shrine bowl practices and game.  For some reason, there have been a lot of undrafted free agents and day 3 DTs succeed in the NFL.  This could be one.)                          
×
×
  • Create New...