Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Too early to say this team is done?


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mc52beast said:

Four straight losses, all to teams we should’ve beat and especially a Giants team who couldn’t get out of their own way.

I can realistically see us losing to the Cons next week and possibility not winning another game.

Yes, it's over. The Giants are not "sneaky good" like the Texans. They're just bad. A blow-out loss to them means that we're firmly in the conversation for worst team in the NFL. There is not a single other team that I would at least give us a 50-50 shot to beat. Not even Jax or Miami

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll win again.  Toward the end of the season when we're thinking we'll get a top 5 draft pick, then TB puts in all their scrubs and want to get healthy for the playoffs... we'll win enough to drop from the 4th or 5th pick down to the 9th or 10th.  

Something like that.

Then draft a corner.

Edited by T-Wazzle
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, T-Wazzle said:

We'll win again.  Toward the end of the season when we're thinking we'll get a top 5 draft pick, then TB puts in all their scrubs and want to get healthy for the playoffs... we'll win enough to drop from the 4th or 5th pick down to the 9th or 10th.  

Something like that.

Then draft a corner.

This is exactly the sh*t I'm afraid of with Sam.

He did it to the Jets to prevent them from drafting Trevor Lawrence and he'll do it to us to prevent us from getting a high pick when he does the OPPOSITE of what is needed.

That's why I say that if we want to go FULL TANK, then put PJ in.

Who the fug knew that the annoying Cuck-Monster CPsinceday1 would be getting the last laugh?

There is no god.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...