Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What did they see in Darnold?


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mage said:

They saw a QB with a lot of physical talent

Unfortunately I don't think they accounted for the fact that he A) lacks the competitive drive that great QBs have (I'm not saying he doesn't work hard or doesn't love football, but he clearly doesn't have another edge to his attitude or game) and B) doesn't have the mental side of the game

 

Sam has that Tim Teb0w vibe to me where he's a great athlete but can't play QB worth a sh*t. 

Maybe he would fare better being converted into a Tight-End or something since he runs well...LOL.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Complete failure at all levels, players and staff. Sam and the other duds we brought on, except the rookies, this offseason all had NFL tape and most of it was beyond bad and/or sever injury concerns. Hubris in player development goes so far before you have to admit it was also very bad evaluation. 

Beyond a handful of players worth keeping, the rest could be dumped tomorrow and it's a hard bet to make against it that not being an instant improvement simply by addition through subtraction. 

At this point, anything less than quantifiable production is BS and a waste of time. There is so much blame to share and so little worthy of praise. 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

We literally had all these clues on Sam.    He has been the worst starter in the NFL the last 3 years coming to this season.   Everything he is doing horribly…..he displayed to the world over the last 3 NFL seasons before he got here.  And he had the issues coming out of college too before the Jets touched him.   He has been the same guy everywhere he has ever played. 

just like with Teddy, some hoped he could be different than what he had proven to be for years and years.    But yeah, we clearly had the clues on Sam.  

At this point let's agree to disagree..

You're not going to convince me that taking a low risk move on a talented young player is bad move..

You were convinced a player is what he is after 3 season in a terrible situation.. I wasn't..

You were also convinced about Jake Delhome in New Orleans as well I guess..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

What about Young, Doug Williams, .. You got a excuse for them??


they just aren’t comparable scenarios. 

I mean Favre and Sam just aren’t comps.  Not the situations at all.  Again, Favre had a total of 4 pass attempts.  Packers didn’t take in a guy who stunk up the league for 3 straight years to be the dude. 

and Young and Williams weren’t picked up to be the man either after being train wrecks for 3 years.   Young went and sat behind what was the GOAT for almost half a decade before shot #2.   Doug left the NFL entirely and was eventually brought back in as a backup.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

At this point let's agree to disagree..

You're not going to convince me that taking a low risk move on a talented young player is bad move..

You were convinced a player is what he is after 3 season in a terrible situation.. I wasn't..

You were also convinced about Jake Delhome in New Orleans as well I guess..

I knew nothing about Jake Delhomme. Never saw him play before he suited up for us.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:


they just aren’t comparable scenarios. 

I mean Favre and Sam just aren’t comps.  Not the situations at all.  Again, Favre had a total of 4 pass attempts.  Packers didn’t take in a guy who stunk up the league for 3 straight years to be the dude. 

and Young and Williams weren’t picked up to be the man either after being train wrecks for straight 3 years.   Young went and sat behind what was the GOAT for almost half a decade before shot #2.   Doug left the NFL entirely and was eventually brought back in as a backup.  

That's Bull poo and you know it.. Its way more comparable situation then you want to give credence to..

You can make a point and be wrong its okay...  

Are you here really saying players never suck at 1 team never get better on another??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

At this point let's agree to disagree..

You're not going to convince me that taking a low risk move on a talented young player is bad move..

You were convinced a player is what he is after 3 season in a terrible situation.. I wasn't..

You were also convinced about Jake Delhome in New Orleans as well I guess..

Low risk?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

That's Bull poo and you know it.. Its way more comparable situation then you want to give credence to..

You can make a point and be wrong its okay...  

Are you here really saying players never suck at 1 team never get better on another??

It took Doug and Young years to get a second shot.   That’s what should of happened to Sam.  See if he could be fixed.   Time.  And then he be given an opportunity to play again…if he deserved and earned it.  

Sam should of been on the Mitch Trubisky path.  That’s the normal path for a bad QB like Sam.    

there isn’t a example of a QB as bad as Sam….just playing his way out of it with a new uniform. 


 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

It took Doug and Young years to get a second shot.   That’s what should of happened to Sam.  See if he could be fixed.   Time.  And then he be given an opportunity to play again…if he deserved and earned it.  

Sam should of been on the Mitch Trubisky path.  That’s the normal path for a bad QB like Sam.    

there isn’t a example of a QB as bad as Sam….just playing his way out of being so bad.  



 

 

Not the same league.. Player get 2nd chances shot quicker now.. 

Just like Rookie QBS don't sit 2 years before starting now as well..

If we had a Josh Allen maybe we could have done that but ...........

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Not the same league.. Player get 2nd chances shot quicker now.. 

 

Trubisky? Rosen? Bortles? Gabbert? Locker? EJ?  Ponder? 

I mean what we attempted with Sam is unique.   No one is snatching up the really bad busted QBs and rolling with them right away. 

Seems like the path Young and them took still is in play.  Got to earn your way back to a chance.  

making Sam the dude seems like a pretty self inflicted mistake that a front office shouldn’t make IMO.  Got no issue with bringing a someone like him in to an org.  But you have to actually see if you can fix them first.   

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WOW!! said:

1 pick ... I know you want to act like we didn't get those picks back.. But reality is all we end up giving up is 1 2nd round pick for Sam... 

And I don't blame the effort nor do I think it was a crazy plan... It has worked before when a highly drafted QB goes to a different team and has a better career..

Favre, Young, Brees, and others...

Farve hot garbage in Atlanta,  Young and Doug Williams hot Garbage in Tampa..

Favre and Young are outliers, I can name 5 other QBs for every Favre or Young.

 

I was right when I compared him to Josh Rosen. They just suck no matter the circumstances, no sugarcoating it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...