Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady on the hot seat.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Brady isn't the best coach for sure on the subtleties of running an offense, but I think he's being thrown under the bus for his overall performance.  How can he be blamed for this offensive line and Darnold not being able to see open receivers??  He probably can't even put in 1/3rd of his damn playbook because of the o-line and QB.  We all talk about running more...do you think this line can open enough holes consistently to have a run game?  We can't get one fugging yard when we need to with the run game.  We sure as poo can't have many passing plays with double moves or anything where it takes time for the play to develop because Sam has the defense in his face and has now gone completely off the rails and reverted back to throwing off his back foot, off balances, legs splayed every damn where because he's scared pooless of getting broken in half.

There have been some poor situational calls, but I almost need to see the film for those plays before I blame Brady because I bet on a few of them we have had a receiver, running back, or tight end open and this flustercuck of an o-line and scared poo-less QB can't execute.  The damn stupid running plays on 3rd and 1 and 4th and 1 are all on Brady though because my damn 6 year old knows they aren't going to work.

tl,dr:  If Brady is being blamed for this poo show then Rhule, Fitterer, and anyone else who thought this o-line would be decent enough for the NFL needs to call an Uber and get the hell outta BoA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2021 at 7:36 PM, Zod said:

Good at drawing up plays. Bad at teaching, coaching, and situational play calling. 

Pretty much this right here.

He's clearly a gifted play designer that we all expected to have some growing pains as a play caller... but there's also the question of how effective Joe is as a teacher. It's one thing for one guy to be in the wrong spot, it's another for everybody to be having mental lapses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Icege said:

Pretty much this right here.

He's clearly a gifted play designer that we all expected to have some growing pains as a play caller... but there's also the question of how effective Joe is as a teacher. It's one thing for one guy to be in the wrong spot, it's another for everybody to be having mental lapses.

Well he wasn’t making the calls at LSU.

AA351B24-466A-4943-A498-A9EE7A0445C4.jpeg

Edited by Tbe
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...