Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady on the hot seat.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Brady isn't the best coach for sure on the subtleties of running an offense, but I think he's being thrown under the bus for his overall performance.  How can he be blamed for this offensive line and Darnold not being able to see open receivers??  He probably can't even put in 1/3rd of his damn playbook because of the o-line and QB.  We all talk about running more...do you think this line can open enough holes consistently to have a run game?  We can't get one fugging yard when we need to with the run game.  We sure as poo can't have many passing plays with double moves or anything where it takes time for the play to develop because Sam has the defense in his face and has now gone completely off the rails and reverted back to throwing off his back foot, off balances, legs splayed every damn where because he's scared pooless of getting broken in half.

There have been some poor situational calls, but I almost need to see the film for those plays before I blame Brady because I bet on a few of them we have had a receiver, running back, or tight end open and this flustercuck of an o-line and scared poo-less QB can't execute.  The damn stupid running plays on 3rd and 1 and 4th and 1 are all on Brady though because my damn 6 year old knows they aren't going to work.

tl,dr:  If Brady is being blamed for this poo show then Rhule, Fitterer, and anyone else who thought this o-line would be decent enough for the NFL needs to call an Uber and get the hell outta BoA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2021 at 7:36 PM, Zod said:

Good at drawing up plays. Bad at teaching, coaching, and situational play calling. 

Pretty much this right here.

He's clearly a gifted play designer that we all expected to have some growing pains as a play caller... but there's also the question of how effective Joe is as a teacher. It's one thing for one guy to be in the wrong spot, it's another for everybody to be having mental lapses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Icege said:

Pretty much this right here.

He's clearly a gifted play designer that we all expected to have some growing pains as a play caller... but there's also the question of how effective Joe is as a teacher. It's one thing for one guy to be in the wrong spot, it's another for everybody to be having mental lapses.

Well he wasn’t making the calls at LSU.

AA351B24-466A-4943-A498-A9EE7A0445C4.jpeg

Edited by Tbe
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...