Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bѓĩñg Cãm bãĉk?


Happy Panther
 Share

Bring Superman back?  

154 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you?

    • Yes
      67
    • No
      75
    • Maybe
      12


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Icege said:

Could you imagine having an aneurysm over Bridgewater not challenging deep and Darnold's inconsistent mechanics only to say that Cam could save us?

Let the poor man transition to the next stage of his iconic career already. Stop asking him to come get annihilated behind a non-existent OL again. Y'all hated it when they did it to him but are the first ones to sign him up to do it again. 😮

 

You obviously don't think Cam's mobility would tremendously help the offensive line.

Carolina's current WR room would be the best Cam's had, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CammyCamLoveDaKidz said:

You obviously don't think Cam's mobility would tremendously help the offensive line.

Carolina's current WR room would be the best Cam's had, too.

I don't, because the coaches are going to ask him to keep looking downfield which was how Rivera & Shula got Cam killed. That's what they're asking Sam to do (who is a much better athlete than he is given credit for tbh).

WR room won't do Cam much good if he's getting killed behind the OL or if his shoulder can't hold up an entire season.

I'd rather see Cam play somewhere that is going to not only appreciate him, but not sacrifice him. Carolina just isn't that right fit for him currently imo.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

the way you conjure up thoughts to fit your agenda is wild

 

you mind is a dangerous place

I Wish Straight Jacket GIF by The Kid LAROI.

 

im 1 of 1 always will be. also why are you still all-pro and there is no all pro section

Lol so a complete joke. Ignore and thank you for the confirmation 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pimpdaddy said:

Cam aint comin back...but these dumbasses could have avoided a lot of heart ache by keeping him for a couple years while they found a QB...you know, Rhule looking forward to working with Cam....and sht... Rhule is a lyin huggy bear smock wearin mufker...at this point.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Speaking about Steelers “I would not draft a quarterback for at least two to three years. That's just my opinion. I think as a GM, if I'm GMing this team ... the issue that I see with a lot of teams is they get a quarterback and they try and build around that quarterback. I think it should be the other way around. I think you should build a team and put your quarterback in it. Okay? It happened to me. They had a great football team. They plugged me in. We had a veteran group. It just works. It works better than trying to grab a quarterback and be, okay, we're gonna build around this quarterback, because then it's gonna take you four or five years to build around that quarterback. He's probably gonna look like poo up to it and then you're like, is he really our guy? is he not our guy?"  I agree with him. Only downside  is if you build too good of a roster you’re not drafting high enough to get your  QB
    • I think Bryce running a legit, Cam style RPO would last like maybe two drives before he fumbled it or ran right into a kill shot. 
    • What do they classify as RPO? I've seen that classified anywhere between "the QB sorta faked a handoff from shotgun" as being RPO all the way to "there's a mesh point and the QB is carrying the RB upfield and receivers are actually running routes." We run a lot of the former, not so much the latter (and I'd like to see more of it.)
×
×
  • Create New...