Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy B I’m sorry, it wasn’t all your fault!


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Plug in TB on this team and you will literally replicate 2020 results. how in the world can you possibly say we be in the playoffs…literally nothing has changed offensively…except the oline is worse lol

2020’s stats with a better defense, and this team was in plenty games last year. Teddy isn’t the answer but he’s a good bridge for our would be franchise guy. This is a team knocking on the door. With Sam there’s no chance. He’s not a QB. His accuracy and processing isn’t up to par with this NFL, while Teddys is

Edited by AggieLean
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Why?

Because even if Sam is playing worse now (and I’m not denying that he is) he still doesn’t play that infuriating chicken poo style of football that Bridgewater plays, with his wobbly floaters and passes anywhere but square and in stride. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither one of them is even close to good enough, so I’d rather watch the guy that is going to both get us the higher draft pick and also annoy me less. Darnold is shook and doesn’t have the mental fortitude to get over it. I can accept that better than he’s just a chicken poo style of player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Because even if Sam is playing worse now (and I’m not denying that he is) he still doesn’t play that infuriating chicken poo style of football that Bridgewater plays, with his wobbly floaters and passes anywhere but square and in stride. 

Sam:

7 TD, 8 INT, 60.8 CMP%, 1,814 YDS, 21 SCK, 76.8 RTG, 36.0 QBR

TB5:

13 TD, 5 INT, 70.4 CMP%, 1,914 YDS, 22 SCK, 100.6 RTG, 50.7 QBR

 

...but Silver Platter Sam can "sling it"...

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They both suck and no NFL teams are winning with either as their QB

Some of you are really tone deaf, the best coaching staffs in the NFL require competent quarterbacks to run the offense, do you really think the Cardinals would be 8-1 with Darnold this year, I mean some of you are really unbelievable 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Broncos went 5-11 last year...

...yet TB5 has them off to a winning 5-4 start this season including a win @ Dallas today where TB5 handily outplayed Dak Prescott...

#winner

Denver also has the #3 defense by scoring in the NFL and caught Dallas on their worst day. Teddy and the Broncos have had their clocks cleaned by every other competent team they've faced, noting that garbage time have made things look closer than a few actually were (Dallas today included), and barely snuck by WFT. 

What does this mean? That Teddy is exactly who we know him to be, a middling QB who can avoid losing games when things are perfect around him but can't/won't elevate the team to rise to the level of higher competition. He's having a much better year than Sam, sure, but Carolina wouldn't be going anywhere with him and this staff except to perhaps a wild card loss. 

I'm not going to say that watching Carolina lose is a good thing because this is pretty awful, but it will be worth it if it exposes the emperor's lack of clothes and gets things on the right track. I will say I'm 100% with Jawny that last year was more than enough of Bridgewater's milquetoast BS when things mattered the most. Good riddance.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...