Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers add another USC QB - Barkley


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Or maybe our staff can just stop fuging sucking.  People keep bringing Cam up because he is clearly better than both of the guys they've brought in since, even at half of what he once was.

It's fine if they decided to move on from the only MVP we've ever had if they thought he was done and they had a clear plan in place to upgrade the position.  Instead, they paid a guy 27 million plus for one year then traded him away to trade away a 2nd round pick for a guy that was 100x worse, is the worst starting QB in the NFL and we owe him 18 million next year on top of what we're still paying Teddy.  That's why people won't shut up about Cam.  Why should we?  When its clear most fans know more than this fuging dumbass incompetent staff about the QB position, you're gonna keep hearing about it.  If they knew more, they would've already proven us wrong and they haven't and can't because they don't.  They're fuging idiots.  Right the wrong and bring Cam back until they can find a young QB of the future to groom.

I mean, they could call Cam….I don’t see Cam answering the call.  

I think he will take us suffering as a win for him and keep it moving.  Plus he couldn’t trust Rhule and company not to do him shitty once again. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Right the wrong and bring Cam back until they can find a young QB of the future to groom.

You do know it takes two to tango right? Cam very well might not want to come back. Beyond that, Tepper and Rhule will not swallow their egos. The Cam as a Panther is over and done with. It's time to move on.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...