Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A couple in interesting Cam things from nfl.com


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, ladypanther said:

https://www.nfl.com/news/slim-chance-cam-newton-is-active-vs-cardinals-with-small-package-of-plays

Anyone have any insight to past communication issues?  Is that about they way his departure was handled or further back than that?

Well seeing as how Rhule barely spoke to Darnold until week 5-6 I’m glad Cam basically is forcing rhule to do his fuging job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iamhubby1 said:

lol Buttons pushed, responses expected.

No buttons are pushed it is total hypocrisy on your part. 

Even if Cam is no better than Teddy or Darnold it still proves the point we should have never wasted the resources on either of them and just let Cam play until we drafted a real replacement.

It was a total screw up by this staff than you seem to love so much. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

Man, the Cam Stan's are Stanning hard I tell ya what. If Cam doesn't light it up, this place could be on suicide watch.

 

On second thought, this place will be in "Build an Excuse Land". lol

...

Edited by rico6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

No buttons are pushed it is total hypocrisy on your part. 

Even if Cam is no better than Teddy or Darnold it still proves the point we should have never wasted the resources on either of them and just let Cam play until we drafted a real replacement.

It was a total screw up by this staff than you seem to love so much. 

apparently @iamhubby1 will poo your post if you're too negative on the franchise, then comes out of nowhere to type this bullshit.

Cam exposes all.

 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rico6 said:

Funny how the overly positive retard brigade is noticeably absent when Sam was shitcanned. 

They’ve just attached  themselves to the cam bandwagon and woe to those that don’t agree 

Edited by RJK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

 

And look who gets triggered. The usual suspects. lol

Says the guy who has now pulled a full 180. Everyone was supposed to be behind Darnold and the Panthers no matter what. All positivity all the time. Sam goes full meltdown and you disappear just to come crawling out throwing shade at people who are happy Cam is back. Triggered? Yeah, you are. 🤡

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...