Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Robby Sucks" and "It's all the OL's fault" folks


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

ToLd YaLl AbOuT pJ

Aged well huh?

Elf has been a shot in the arm so far - he has looked SOLID in there at center outside of the first snap of the game but I honestly don't know if thats in him or the QB.

CMC back has made a huge difference as well. 

 

And finally the elephant in the room... No Murray. That's going to make a HUGE difference. 

 

I cant wait to see Cam with more time under his belt and starting. The mojo of this team is night and day.

Edited by SteveSmithTD89
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

And if that's the case, he's still better than Darnold by magnitudes, which is good enough to win.

I don’t disagree but if we have playoff hopes we are going to need a guy who doesn’t make you think he’s going to throw a pick every quarter. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

ToLd YaLl AbOuT pJ

Aged well huh?

Elf has been a shot in the arm so far - he has looked SOLID in there at center outside of the first snap of the game but I honestly don't know if thats in him or the QB.

CMC back has made a huge difference as well. 

 

And finally the elephant in the room... No Murray. That's going to make a HUGE difference. 

For them and our defense.  It has nothing to do with our offense.

And what I have specifically said about PJ is he has had the strongest arm on our roster for the last 20 months until Cam came back (and he still might in regards to ability to throw farther), and that he has been the best available playmaker at the QB position with his legs, and yet, he was sitting behind Teddy and Sam.  And I said his one big flaw was his decision making occasionally.

Yeah, he threw a pick, but it was still a better misplaced throw than Sam threw all year, if there is such a thing....  it was close.  And I'm not gonna knock him for attempting to make a play and being relatively close in a 20-0 game with how our defense is playing.  Regardless, are you going to pretend he wasn't throwing at almost a 70% clip and his ball placement has been A-1 outside of that pick?  He is making throws that Sam can't make in a wet dream and the offense is moving.  These throws to CMC and the timing throws on slants and such are incredible.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...