Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PJ is still undefeated


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

Absolutely great team win, and PJ had a part in that and the entire team looks different with Cam back.  Everyone knows this is Cam's team, and PJ doesn't seem to mind that one bit.

PJ was way more accurate than in past games, so maybe 2 weeks with the ones helped.  But he still took unnecessary risks and missed the mark in really weird ways... To be briefly critical... 2 turnovers is unacceptable for a backup frankly (let alone a starter - I'm looking at you, Darnold) and while he kept the offense moving, we need to get Cam up to speed as soon as possible IMO because in tougher games 2 turnovers could be costly.  Still, for only his second start, not bad and if we need him to start in the future, hopefully a bit more time with the 1s irons out more issues.  It was clear that when we were put in long downs he struggled.

1st start - 70% completed 

2nd start - 75% completed 

too much is made of his garbage time stats IMO.   If you prep him for a start, he does pretty well for what he is. 

Garbage time brings out his biggest flaw.   He is overly aggressive and wants to make a play every down.   So if you put him out there to pass every down.  He tries to make a play every down.   He needs to learn to play for another down when the play isn’t really there.   But he has only 2 starts in the NFL.  I think he has legit backup potential.   We are 2-0 with him.  That’s the job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

1st start - 70% completed 

2nd start - 75% completed 

too much is made of his garbage time stats IMO.   If you prep him for a start, he does pretty well for what he is. 

Garbage time brings out his biggest flaw.   He is overly aggressive and wants to make a play every down.   So if you put him out there to pass every down.  He tries to make a play every down.   He needs to learn to play for another down when the play isn’t really there.   But he has only 2 starts in the NFL.  I think he has legit backup potential.   We are 2-0 with him.  That’s the job. 

against Detroit he threw an interception when it was 7-0... that's not garbage time...

but hopefully you're right, since I suspect he'll be around for a bit longer lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

against Detroit he threw an interception when it was 7-0... that's not garbage time...

but hopefully you're right, since I suspect he'll be around for a bit longer lol

I mean, his flaw simply exists.  Saw it vs Det and today.   Saw it that goal line play earlier this year. 

he has to learn live to play for another down when it isn’t there.  Right now, if he is tasked a pass….he is going to try to make the play.   No matter what.  But he is young.  

I think he has a nice skill set though.  Plenty of room to grow IMO.  He could end up being a our backup.  I always thought people have been overly hard on him because of our starters. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cams arm is healthy then this isn’t going to be PJs job for long. PJ has some serious limitations with accuracy getting the ball downfield. That was super conservative playcalling. Not saying that’ll change a whole lot with Cam. But the threat of the run and potential deep balls over the middle will at least be there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CRA said:

I mean, his flaw simply exists.  Saw it vs Det and today.   Saw it that goal line play earlier this year. 

he has to learn live to play for another down when it isn’t there.  Right now, if he is tasked a pass….he is going to try to make the play.   No matter what.  But he is young.  

I think he has a nice skill set though.  Plenty of room to grow IMO.  He could end up being a our backup.  I always thought people have been overly hard on him because of our starters. 

Well, if he had no flaws, he wouldn't be a back up.  

But yeah, he definitely has a good shot at being a career backup for us.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really happy for PJ. The guy came out and made the most of his opportunities. But you hold your breath every time the ball goes down field with him. He threw one pick, really should have had a second but the defender bobbled the ball. 

The offense we ran with PJ against the Cardinals was eerily similar to the one we ran the first three weeks with Sam Darnold. 10 of PJ's 22 completions were dump offs to CMC. CMC had 23 touches (and he would have had more had the game been closer) That game plan got us to 3-0, including a win over the Saints. It also got CMC to IR. 

In many ways, I see a lot of similarities between this Arizona game and the Saints game earlier. We beat a good, but depleted team with an offensive game plan that isn't sustainable. If PJ is asked to start for too long, my concern is we'll start seeing multiple turnover games from him. But that's true for a lot of backup level QBs in the NFL.

Edited by trueblade
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest question to me is do any of you think that maybe PJ showed enough yesterday to potentially be considered a good backup moving forward for years to come? He didn't look awful and looks like a capable leader behind a starter to me. He also seemed like a good teammate celebrating with Cam and just looking happy out there. He seems to have a positive vibe and now looks like he could have the skills to be a solid backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PJ wasn't without flaws yesterday but he stood tall in the pocket and made some really good throws. Even with the few gaffes that's the best we've seen in weeks from a Panthers qb. The guy doesn't deserve the hate he has received here especially when you consider who he took the reins from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's strange that you still can't see where I'm coming from, and I guarantee you don't have more faith in him than I do.  You're looking at him in a vacuum, not about the team around him and the likely offensive game plans this season. We're going to be a run first team with 3 receiving options better than any of the other players on past rookie 1k seasons. If you can't understand that, then it's a you problem, not a me problem. Arizona's previous basketball coach, Sean Miller, used to do something at the first team meeting of every season and I think it's soooooooooo applicable to this situation. He'd have every player right down how many minutes/points they expected to average that season and then he'd add them up.  It would show that if they all hit those numbers, we'd score like 125 points a game and need to be playing 7 guys at a time to get their minutes. That's pretty much how you guys are putting your T-Mac expectations out there, looking solely at the player and what you think he should be able to do, not how the offense will operate as a whole. Every yard one player gets is one less yard someone else can get.  It sounds like I just have more faith in Thielen, XL, and Coker this year than most everyone else.  But a big reason for that faith is because of T-Mac and how much he'll open things up for the rest of them and Bryce being the type of QB to take the open easy passes than force it to his #1. As I've said, if any one of the following happens... Thielen ends the season sub 700 yards, XL or Coker end up sub 500 yards... Then yes, I will then shift my expectations for T-Mac's rookie year to be at least 1,000 yard season. But since I have faith in those other 3 having solid seasons, it tempers my expectations yardage totals for T-Mac this year, and this year alone.  I've also clearly stated many times that I think he's going to reach 10 TDs. If T-Mac ends the season with 800 yards and 10 TDs, while Thielen gets 900-1,000 and XL/Coker each get around 600, I don't see any world where that is a failure for a rookie season for T-Mac. Because again, we're talking about expectations, not what is possible.  So given the other WR options, I can't EXPECT T-Mac to get to the 1k mark, which is a far cry from me saying I don't think he can get there. Do you really not see the difference there?  
    • I don't recall anyone seeing this coming.  I mean, two seperate things for me.  I thought BB just might not work in college football because he is old grumpy man and college is about appealing to young kids.   So yeah, that could of gone great or horrible.  Coin flip.  This isn't that convo for me.  what we are witnessing right now play out.....this was never part of the disaster possibility/path discussed lol.  Really weird stuff.  Or maybe I missed the part where UNC hires a 20 year old "girlfriend" that apparently runs the Bill operation and before the season even starts is taking over more than just Bill but influence of the entire UNC operation.  That was her getting that official statement made today.  It was her sabotaging the Hard Knocks UNC show because she somehow wasn't the star.  Seems like elder abuse lol.  Only largely kidding.  You even got Charles Barkley saying he normally doesn't talk about personal lives of his friends but he might have to check in on Bill because this ain't normal stuff lol.  Anyway, it's entertaining.  Everything is a cartoon it seems these days.   
    • I think its strange how you were claiming this guy was the second coming of Mike Evans and you can't even get behind 1k yards? I guess I have more faith in him than you
×
×
  • Create New...