Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam's contract and our options


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

In your post you are talking about Sam as a rookie and him potentially being a long term guy for us. That isn't gonna happen.

This may very well be the last stop in Sam Darnold's NFL career.

Who knows with this staff what will happen. On one hand we keep PJ to develop but showed Bridgewater a quick exit. Remember those were Rhule's words not mine. Then again whether he talks guys up or not it doesnt seem to be related to whether they stay or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Who knows with this staff what will happen. On one hand we keep PJ to develop but showed Bridgewater a quick exit. Remember those were Rhule's words not mine. Then again whether he talks guys up or not it doesnt seem to be related to whether they stay or not.

I think there was obvious and building frustration about Sam during the last few press conferences. When that happened to Teddy, he was shown the door fairly quickly.

I agree that you never can tell with this staff but it does seem like when they change their minds on a player, they get shown the door fairly quickly.

I suspect they will try to move him and then they cut him towards camp as they find better backup options.

To me that is why you cut your losses. It's impossible to trust him in games anymore, so what use is he? 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think there was obvious and building frustration about Sam during the last few press conferences. When that happened to Teddy, he was shown the door fairly quickly.

I agree that you never can tell with this staff but it does seem like when they change their minds on a player, they get shown the door fairly quickly.

I suspect they will try to move him and then they cut him towards camp as they find better backup options.

To me that is why you cut your losses. It's impossible to trust him in games anymore, so what use is he? 

Then again if you can't move him and are paying 18 million already it makes little sense to cut him unless you dont think he deserves an inactive roster spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Then again if you can't move him and are paying 18 million already it makes little sense to cut him unless you dont think he deserves an inactive roster spot.

We ditched Teddy and he was much better than Sam so it wouldn’t surprise me if we just straight up cut Sam.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Then again if you can't move him and are paying 18 million already it makes little sense to cut him unless you dont think he deserves an inactive roster spot.

I think that's the thing, in a 17 game season without any "real" expansion of the roster, he probably isn't gonna make the final roster. Reference the fact we cut down to only 2 roster QB's for this season. He may end up the odd man out, $18.8 mil or not.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, firefox1234 said:

We ditched Teddy and he was much better than Sam so it wouldn’t surprise me if we just straight up cut Sam.

Is that how you see it? We got a 6th round pick and saved $4.5 million by trading Bridgewater. Much different than straight cutting Darnold with no picks or cap savings whatsoever. To me cutting him makes zero sense. If you can't trade him, at least keep him as your backup. Stupid to pay Darnold $18 million anyway and then have to pay for a backup qb on top of that. Just lighting money on fire. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Peon Awesome said:

Is that how you see it? We got a 6th round pick and saved $4.5 million by trading Bridgewater. Much different than straight cutting Darnold with no picks or cap savings whatsoever. To me cutting him makes zero sense. If you can't trade him, at least keep him as your backup. Stupid to pay Darnold $18 million anyway and then have to pay for a backup qb on top of that. Just lighting money on fire. 

We literally brought the guy back we tried to replace while still paying his replacements. We are way past that point of worrying about stuff like that….

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, firefox1234 said:

We literally brought the guy back we tried to replace while still paying his replacements. We are way past that point of worrying about stuff like that….

So the lesson is when you make a mistake that hurts your team, just keep compounding the mistake, cause like, you've already done worse, so who cares? It actually makes it a hell of a lot more important that we don't. We've wasted enough money on our QB situation.

But sure, let's go with your attitude. Why not sign Josh Rosen and Dwayne Haskins this offseason? We literally signed 2 QBs who failed at their last stops. We are way past the point of worrying about whether 2 more might fail.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • While I'd love to add him, it just doesn't make sense for where we are at in our re-build right now. The only teams who should be interested are those who have a very legitimate shot at winning the SB this season, as any team who makes the trade is going to be mortgaging their future to make the move. Teams who make these kinds of trades and then give them the massive contract, in the hopes that it will expedite their path to contention, ALWAYS ends up backfiring because they have to give up the 1st round picks that are then needed to help build out the rest of the roster after eating up such a significant chunk of the cap on the new contract. There is no way the Cowboys trade him for anything less than 2 future 1st rounders (and probably more), plus we'll have to make him the highest paid non QB in league history.  Not to mention that it would then have made the Scourton and/or Princely picks a bit of a waste, as those 2nd and 3rd round picks would have been better off used on a ILB or DB
    • Like his approach to pre season that's ro get them out there and play together for a few plays and right about the night before and morning before.  Maybe we can come out the gate on fire I can smell the smoke from here!!   Go Panthers
    • Only 26 years old, fills the biggest hole on our roster. Top 3 at his respective position, yeah fug it how often does a future HOF player become available in their prime?
×
×
  • Create New...