Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pot Roast ripping into Defense on sidelines Sunday


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Did I dream that...damn 🤦‍♂️

How about benching a few guys?!?

Well we try that too but the bench guys are on the bench for a reason.

I am not too concerned about the WTF's game. I will be concerned if the defense shits the bed again this Sunday. Otherwise, just a throw away game where not much worked out for us.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

I would be interested to hear someone who actually knows the game break down the specific issues with the defensive struggle vs specific teams. 

I'm not interested in emotion. I'm talking about a real analysis from a real coach or former player. We don't have that anywhere. 

 

I suspect Thomas Davis will on Panthers Huddle…it’s on in Raleigh on Saturday nights around 7pm, depending on the finish of the preceding college game 

Thomas is well worth making the time to here…rest Of the show is pablum. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, AU-panther said:

A lot of times when a defense is getting gashed in the running game it’s not just about effort or having bigger players, it’s about discipline.

Gap responsibility and doing your assignment is paramount and my guess is this is why you are hearing all of these comments about leadership needing to hold people accountable.

 

I am wondering if the Panthers inability to stop the Washington running attack was due to poor gap control or the fact that the team is lacking in talent when they face teams that play a smash mouth running game? I hope the answer is the first,not the latter, or else we are in trouble..

Edited by KatsAzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Well we try that too but the bench guys are on the bench for a reason.

I am not too concerned about the WTF's game. I will be concerned if the defense shits the bed again this Sunday. Otherwise, just a throw away game where not much worked out for us.

I think Daviyon Nixon was playing some underrated DT before he got injured, Phil Hoskins still isn't up to speed so you're left with Bravvion-Rex as your only rotational DT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, AU-panther said:

We are 6th in the league in points allowed, but by all means lets go to big boy ball so we stop the few teams that run on us but then we can complain that we can't stop 75% of the teams that throw on us.

NFL Football Stats - NFL Team Opponent Points per Game | TeamRankings.com

Don't get me wrong, its never a bad idea to add talent, my point earlier is often when a team has sucess running on you its not just because your players aren't "big enough", often players are following their assignments.

Personally I think this is why there has been all this chatter of leaders have to hold people accountable.

 

 

I'm speaking of the personell to run 3-4. How they are usually tweeners and hybrid guys. Undersized specialists.

If a throwing team knows you're not good at countering zone blocks, they will feed you a healthy dose until you stop it and throw in you too.

If they decide to put one of their 300lb lineman on your 240-50lb LB, that physical advantage opens up the gaps the RB can then pick and choose.

I see your point but bigger stronger faster always wins the battles in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rippadonn said:

I'm speaking of the personell to run 3-4. How they are usually tweeners and hybrid guys. Undersized specialists.

If a throwing team knows you're not good at countering zone blocks, they will feed you a healthy dose until you stop it and throw in you too.

If they decide to put one of their 300lb lineman on your 240-50lb LB, that physical advantage opens up the gaps the RB can then pick and choose.

I see your point but bigger stronger faster always wins the battles in the long run.

Of course bigger, stronger, and faster always wins, but in reality when you go bigger and stronger you end up slower.  
Maybe our defense gets better against the run but worse against the pass.  Maybe instead of being 6th in points allowed we become 16th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I just dont get the worry over losing a practice squad player that just went undrafted. Everyone just made their selections. The chances of a team wanting to sign him to an active roster after not selecting him is very low.  If that interested they would have taken him late to evaluate in person. As far as I can tell two qbs were signed off another teams practice squad last season and they were both going in to their 5th season.
    • I enjoyed reading this thread and the usual banter that follows. The only silver lining I can identify right now is we do actually have a couple of young QB's behind him and we do have a nice roster on both sides of the ball built around the most important position. So if the team overall shows some promise but we still falter largely due to a lack of consistent passing output (again) hopefully the decision makers can be free to make the best decision for the team going forward after the conclusion of this upcoming season.
    • I don't really follow the team anymore due to a variety of reasons and consequently have largely stopped posting but I agree that this is a lovely website and community. This forum probably kept me around for years longer than I would've stuck otherwise because of how difficult it was to stop checking multiple times a day. Especially appreciate how lax the moderation tends to be compared to a lot of places, the crew here does a great job. Out of curiousity I decided to try making a new account (solely for testing purposes) to see what exactly is wrong with the sign up process. The issue seems to be that it never sends you an account verification email, thus making it impossible to complete registration. This is likely something to do with the email server upstream, hope it gets fixed. Also, lol
×
×
  • Create New...