Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparing resumés


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, thennek said:

Nixon is OC for 5-games and that is it. This move looks like desperation. Firing Brady needed to be done but it did not fix the multiple problems this team has. 
Rhule should be fired just on how poorly the QB situation was handled. A rebuilding team giving away valuable draft picks with little value in return if another fireable offense. 

Maybe, but from the looks of it, he was more qualified than Brady.  And with actual real NFL experience under Andy Reid.    

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Nixon was not named OC, the Panthers only said that he would act in that capacity over the final five games.  I'm still hoping we go after an actual NFL OC this offseason.

This is correct.

That said, I don't have a whole lot of faith in Matt Rhule on that front.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

This is correct.

That said, I don't have a whole lot of faith in Matt Rhule on that front.

Perhaps.  But I've got to believe that another season of offensive incompetence like we've witnessed this year will end with Rhule being ousted.  Now, I'm not keen to wait another year to see this happen, but at least we know he's feeling pressure now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

We fell for the hype.

Sean McVay's success has sent a bunch of other teams looking for the next version of him. 

Sean McVay actually worked his way up into his OC role. I’m dumbfounded how this group of buffoons looked at Joe Brady’s resume and trusted him with an NFL offense.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...