Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's Way too early mock draft 2022

Verge

By Verge,
in 2023 NFL Draft

 Share

Recommended Posts

unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted
On 12/7/2021 at 5:33 PM, Verge said:

You have to balance that with the talent around him. One of the same issues Josh Allen had coming out iirc (beyond his accuracy of course)

Josh Allen is 6’6” 250 with a cannon. His problems could be overcome by size and not having to alter an offense to accommodate him. 

Willis has thrown 12 picks this year

2:1 TD:INT ratio. 

Corral’s TD: INT is 20:4 and has a huge arm.  I lien corral better 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Day 2? You mean that day when we have no draft picks because of brilliant trades?

Exactly.

I'd love to hear whether or not scouts are finding the 2nd - 4th round prospects to be fairly close. I recall Fitterer saying that guys 26 - 100 (or 150?) were all round about the same impact-wise. If they had the foresight to ID a potentially weak 2nd & 3rd round, it makes the CJ Henderson trade even better (or the Sam Darnold trade even worse if it's a strong class).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

*incoming hot take alert*

Honestly, if Willis was playing in a P5 conference consistently facing good teams I think he'd be considered a late round flyer type of pick.

He had a hell of a year last year (yeah weak competition) and has some talent. Could be a boom or bust like Trey Lance (also looked bad against better competition), but without the size. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saX man Mentor

saX man

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

*incoming hot take alert*

Honestly, if Willis was playing in a P5 conference consistently facing good teams I think he'd be considered a late round flyer type of pick.

Yeah not huge on Willis. Corral, Pickett and Strong are my faves. Ridder and Howell not far behind. But Willis..I acknowledge the upside but his game v Corral was very underwhelming.. surrounding talent considered.

Edited by saX man
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, saX man said:

He has such a pretty and accurate deep ball though.  The downfield placement is hard to ignore IMO and that Nevada offense asks a lot of him.  More advanced than the typical college system.  Think he's hands down the best pure QB in the class.

Verge said NO man move on…lol

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

*incoming hot take alert*

Honestly, if Willis was playing in a P5 conference consistently facing good teams I think he'd be considered a late round flyer type of pick.

That's all we need to hear to know that he's actually a top 5 prospect. 😛

Sassy GIF by reactionseditor

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
On 12/7/2021 at 4:24 PM, Verge said:

Every year around this time everyone says "this QB class is bad and we don't have a guy I would take in the top 10" or some nonsense. This class is fine, not as good as last year, but it has three guys with first round grades for me. Pickett and Willis clearly at the top.

People love to talk about how there isn't any consensus 1st overall type of QB, guess what?  We don't ahve the overall 1st pick.

This is a bad year to have the 1st overall pick and need a QB.  Usually if you have the 1st overall pick you are hoping for a Luck or Manning type of prospect.  There isn't that in this class.

Last year if you were picking 12th you would have ended up with the 5th QB off of the board, this year year maybe the 2nd.  There is a very good chacne thye could have similar type of scouting grades.

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

People love to talk about how there isn't any consensus 1st overall type of QB, guess what?  We don't ahve the overall 1st pick.

This is a bad year to have the 1st overall pick and need a QB.  Usually if you have the 1st overall pick you are hoping for a Luck or Manning type of prospect.  There isn't that in this class.

Last year if you were picking 12th you would have ended up with the 5th QB off of the board, this year year maybe the 2nd.  There is a very good chacne thye could have similar type of scouting grades.

 

 

Good point. You could potentially get your number 1 rated QB at pick 8. If there was Lawrence in this class, you would have no chance…

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Good point. You could potentially get your number 1 rated QB at pick 8. If there was Lawrence in this class, you would have no chance…

It would not surprise me at all if some teams, us included, have similar grades on the top 1-2 QBs this year that they did on QBs 4 and 5 last year.  That doesn't guarantee these guys will work out, but purely from an evaluation standpoint the situations are similar.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Esterdams
      https://www.facebook.com/BiopeakMaleEnhancementHealth/

      By Esterdams · Posted

      ꧁༺✨❗Shop Now ❗✨༻꧂ https://worksupplement.com/biopeak-male-enhancement-buy ꧁༺✨❗Facebook Now❗✨༻꧂ https://www.facebook.com/BiopeakMaleEnhancementHealth/   ➥✅ Official Website: Biopeak Male Enhancement ➥✅ Product Name: Biopeak Male Enhancement ➥✅ Rating: ★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) ➥✅ Side Effects: No Major Side Effects ➥✅ Availability: In Stock US   In the realm of male enhancement supplements, the market is flooded with promises of vitality, virility, and vigor. Amidst this sea of offerings, Biopeak Male Enhancement stands out as a beacon of hope for those seeking to reclaim their prowess and confidence in the bedroom. But what sets Biopeak apart from the rest? Let’s delve deeper into the science, ingredients, and user experiences to uncover the essence of this intriguing supplement.   FOR MORE INFO CLICK HERE :👇👇 https://www.facebook.com/BiopeakMaleEnhancementHealth/ https://sites.google.com/view/biopeakmaleenhancementshop/home https://sites.google.com/view/biopeakmaleenhancementhealth/home https://biopeak-male-enhancement-work.jimdosite.com/ https://biopeak-male-enhancement-price-1.jimdosite.com/ https://medium.com/@curtissfaulk/biopeak-male-enhancement-critical-customer-warning-up-to-75-off-7d7b99cb7f40 https://medium.com/@curtissfaulk/biopeak-male-enhancement-joyful-outcomes-and-accomplishments-wesley-50234a48ece4 https://biopeak-male-enhancement-offer.company.site/ https://www.townscript.com/e/biopeak-male-enhancement-serious-unsafe-side-effects-or-really-proven-to-work-413223 https://curtissfaulk.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/05/09/biopeak-male-enhancement-can-you-trust-official-website-claims https://biopeakmaleenhancementus2024.blogspot.com/2024/05/biopeak-male-enhancement.html https://biopeak-male-enhancement-fad057.webflow.io/   FACEBOOK@:- https://www.facebook.com/BiopeakMaleEnhancementHealth/ https://www.facebook.com/BioCoreCBDGummy/ https://www.facebook.com/Get.ReviveCBDGummiesReviews/ https://www.facebook.com/Get.ZenLeafCBDGummiesUS/
    • strato
      College Athletes can now be paid directly by schools to play

      By strato · Posted

      The If they have to pay the guys that generate the revenue, how do they support the parasitic programs?  You'd have to go purely by the numbers to keep the most self sufficient sports programs and as many of the lesser revenue producing programs as allowable. By the real numbers not some manufactured hierarchy.  Guess who loses that one. Will people allow them to lose? No there would be hell to pay. So here we go.
    • strato
      Where will the wins come from? (my early predictions)

      By strato · Posted

      If I said more about why I see the league being part of the problem I couldn’t post.  Still love football, my dad was an example of the difference between college and pro. He ended up coaching for several years. I went on a couple of visits for college ball but knew I wasn’t NFL caliber and had some pretty compelling interests outside of athletics and here we are. I went another way. Still love football but seriously falling out of love with the NFL. Have zero love for Tepper.    edit: to stay OnTopic the wins come from facing teams that are down for whatever reason, that week. I don’t know how to know more specifics ahead of their random demises.
×
×
  • Create New...