Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Urban Meyer Fired


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Martin said:

Here is one for some laughter:

image.thumb.png.534f99ee5b626c5ccd114519261fe8e6.png

I think Meyer would have been fine bringing The Golden Calf of Bristol in as a first year assistant coach instead of as a player.  The Golden Calf of Bristol could then help set the tone for the organization and also get some experience coaching.

Having The Golden Calf of Bristol come in as a player, being so old and with no recent playing time, for a position he never played, was just the height of stupidity.  It was hubris on the part of Urban Meyer.  

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Pete Carroll had significant NFL experience, including being head coach in New England prior to taking the Seattle job.  You are correct about Switzer, didn't think about him.  

Calling Switzer a success at the pro level is a stretch.

His trophy came in one year with Jimmy Johnson's team and it was nothing but downhill from there.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More like Urban Fired ha goteem

10 hours ago, BlitzMonster said:

Something changed te-bow in my post to "The Golden Calf of Bristol".   That's not what I wrote.  

Is it some type of bot doing this ??  

T3bowmania swept through this board in 2011 like it did in many places.  It's auto filtered to The Golden Calf of Bristol because ESPN switched to 24/7 coverage of him as illustrated nicely here:

ecmDkbi.png

e: let's see if it still filters Sir Cameron Newton: Leader of Men, Lover of Puppies...Esquire

Edited by The NFL Shield At Midfield
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...