Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Huddle Reaction to Rhule’s Hiring


BIGH2001
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Toomers said:
30 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, they still know more than you do.

(granted, that's a low bar to clear)

  Right into default mode. Same thing you said all off-season and what happened? Every single thing I predicted came true. So anytime you want to compare how high the “bar” is for either of our knowledge, we can do that. How many years you want to go back? 

I make a motion that we start with 3-years 💣💥💯!!!

Do we have a 2nd?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  Right into default mode. Same thing you said all off-season and what happened? Every single thing I predicted came true. So anytime you want to compare how high the “bar” is for either of our knowledge, we can do that. How many years you want to go back? 

I'd suggest you go back about ten years or so and research everything as thoroughly as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans were tired of a Rivera coached team that was only playoff potential and lacking the top end championship coaching for the SB. So, they latched on to hope. Nothing more hopeful than the possibility of a rising star from the college ranks.


Reality is there was nothing better than Rivera available.

 

Gettleman wanting Rhule should have been a red flag to stay away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd suggest you go back about ten years or so and research everything as thoroughly as possible.

Ok. We can start from right now going back. Let’s discuss Sam Darnolds 5th year option you defended many times. While using the argument that professionals made these decisions and shouldn’t be questioned. This after you spent half of a decade bashing everything Hurney/Rivera did(as did I). So it’s ok to question things if you agree, but not if don’t? If you can explain this sort of hypocritical thinking, we can move on to the next item on a long list. 
 

   But we know that’s not going to happen. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Ok. We can start from right now going back. Let’s discuss Sam Darnolds 5th year option you defended many times. While using the argument that professionals made these decisions and shouldn’t be questioned. This after you spent half of a decade bashing everything Hurney/Rivera did(as did I). So it’s ok to question things if you agree, but not if don’t? If you can explain this sort of hypocritical thinking, we can move on to the next item on a long list. 
 

   But we know that’s not going to happen. 

Yeah... I'm not reading that.

I just wanted to see if you were actually dumb enough to  take the bait.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah... I'm not reading that.

I just wanted to see if you were actually dumb enough to  take the bait.

And I showed once again that your football knowledge is basically the ability to search, copy and paste. If the “bar” is low for me, you’re like puddle on the ground. Quit being a coward and back up your BS for once instead of being a hypocrite. I’m not the only poster with an informed opinion you have pulled this on. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

And I showed once again that your football knowledge is basically the ability to search, copy and paste. If the “bar” is low for me, you’re like puddle on the ground. Quit being a coward and back up your BS for once instead of being a hypocrite. I’m not the only poster with an informed opinion you have pulled this on. 

Yeah, not reading this either.

Keep talking if you feel like it, dude. I learned a while ago you're not someone worth engaging in conversation so I don't really care to do more than drop a random insult. 

Declare yourself a winner and pat yourself on the back if it makes you feel better. Being a big deal on this message board seems to mean something to you. Not sure what that says about your life in the real world but hey...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Beck is likely to be a Day 2 or 3 guy.
    • Schlereth calling us back to back....somebody call up Morgan!  Schlereth got that dawg in him!
    • I was just thinking — if Bryce had been the #1 overall pick without the massive trade-up, there wouldn’t be nearly this much anger and resentment toward him. The problem isn’t Bryce himself; it’s what Scott Fitterer gave up to get him and how the front office completely mismanaged the assets that followed. The picks from the Christian McCaffrey trade — one of our few major opportunities to rebuild with young talent — were essentially wasted. The second-rounder was used on Jonathan Mingo,  The third and fourth-round picks were packaged to move up for DJ Johnson, a 25-year-old rookie  who looked like a miss from day 1.  That’s brutal roster management. And when you add in other misses like Trevon Wallace and Xavier Legette—guys who were supposed to be athletic difference-makers but haven’t moved the needle—it just compounds the issue. Combine that with a string of awful free-agent signings (Hurst, Chark, Bozeman regressing, etc.), and it’s no wonder the offense looks like a mess. And this goes beyond Fitterer — it’s a scouting department problem too. For years, the Panthers’ evaluations have been inconsistent and reactive. They’ve chased traits and combine numbers over production and football IQ. The same front office that identified DJ Johnson as a third-round target somehow passed on multiple plug-and-play starters at positions of need. When your scouting process keeps missing on mid-round talent — the backbone of good teams — no quarterback can save you. The lack of depth and development across this roster is the real indictment. None of these failures are Bryce’s fault directly. But when the entire team looks lifeless, the narrative circles back to him. He was supposed to be the “force multiplier,” the “point guard” who elevates everyone else. Problem is, there’s not much “force” around him to multiply, and that style of quarterback play only works when the infrastructure is solid — coaching, protection, and playmakers. Look at the 49ers for comparison. If San Francisco didn’t have elite coaching, culture, and roster talent, that Trey Lance trade would be seen as one of the biggest front-office blunders ever. The difference is they had the organization to survive it. At least Bryce is serviceable — Lance isn’t even on their roster anymore. Put Bryce in the 49ers’ system and he’s probably putting up Brock Purdy-like numbers. The bottom line is this: the dysfunction in Carolina didn’t start with Bryce Young, and it sure hasn’t ended with him. This is a franchise problem — years of poor drafting, weak scouting, short-sighted trades, and constant turnover. The common denominator through all of it? David Tepper. Until the culture, patience, and football operations at the top change, it won’t matter who the quarterback is.  
×
×
  • Create New...