Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Huddle Reaction to Rhule’s Hiring


BIGH2001
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Toomers said:
30 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, they still know more than you do.

(granted, that's a low bar to clear)

  Right into default mode. Same thing you said all off-season and what happened? Every single thing I predicted came true. So anytime you want to compare how high the “bar” is for either of our knowledge, we can do that. How many years you want to go back? 

I make a motion that we start with 3-years 💣💥💯!!!

Do we have a 2nd?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  Right into default mode. Same thing you said all off-season and what happened? Every single thing I predicted came true. So anytime you want to compare how high the “bar” is for either of our knowledge, we can do that. How many years you want to go back? 

I'd suggest you go back about ten years or so and research everything as thoroughly as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans were tired of a Rivera coached team that was only playoff potential and lacking the top end championship coaching for the SB. So, they latched on to hope. Nothing more hopeful than the possibility of a rising star from the college ranks.


Reality is there was nothing better than Rivera available.

 

Gettleman wanting Rhule should have been a red flag to stay away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd suggest you go back about ten years or so and research everything as thoroughly as possible.

Ok. We can start from right now going back. Let’s discuss Sam Darnolds 5th year option you defended many times. While using the argument that professionals made these decisions and shouldn’t be questioned. This after you spent half of a decade bashing everything Hurney/Rivera did(as did I). So it’s ok to question things if you agree, but not if don’t? If you can explain this sort of hypocritical thinking, we can move on to the next item on a long list. 
 

   But we know that’s not going to happen. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Ok. We can start from right now going back. Let’s discuss Sam Darnolds 5th year option you defended many times. While using the argument that professionals made these decisions and shouldn’t be questioned. This after you spent half of a decade bashing everything Hurney/Rivera did(as did I). So it’s ok to question things if you agree, but not if don’t? If you can explain this sort of hypocritical thinking, we can move on to the next item on a long list. 
 

   But we know that’s not going to happen. 

Yeah... I'm not reading that.

I just wanted to see if you were actually dumb enough to  take the bait.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah... I'm not reading that.

I just wanted to see if you were actually dumb enough to  take the bait.

And I showed once again that your football knowledge is basically the ability to search, copy and paste. If the “bar” is low for me, you’re like puddle on the ground. Quit being a coward and back up your BS for once instead of being a hypocrite. I’m not the only poster with an informed opinion you have pulled this on. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

And I showed once again that your football knowledge is basically the ability to search, copy and paste. If the “bar” is low for me, you’re like puddle on the ground. Quit being a coward and back up your BS for once instead of being a hypocrite. I’m not the only poster with an informed opinion you have pulled this on. 

Yeah, not reading this either.

Keep talking if you feel like it, dude. I learned a while ago you're not someone worth engaging in conversation so I don't really care to do more than drop a random insult. 

Declare yourself a winner and pat yourself on the back if it makes you feel better. Being a big deal on this message board seems to mean something to you. Not sure what that says about your life in the real world but hey...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...