Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At Least we dont have nagy....


DeeJay
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Maybe they do, maybe they don't.  Probably won't know for at least two more seasons.  Right now, all they know is he turns the ball over a lot.

poo dude he looked pretty good last night, he needs to clean up the to's but I love his ability to run, throw on the run and be pinpoint accurate when he has time.  I would be super thrilled if I was a bears fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

poo dude he looked pretty good last night, he needs to clean up the to's but I love his ability to run, throw on the run and be pinpoint accurate when he has time.  I would be super thrilled if I was a bears fan

You’d be terrified if you were a Bears fan and fields put up that kind of first year. One of the worst starts ever for a NFL QB ratings wise. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

You’d be terrified if you were a Bears fan and fields put up that kind of first year. One of the worst starts ever for a NFL QB ratings wise. 

No I would realize that he’s a rookie and works with a poo coach that doesn’t design the offense to his strengths. Even with all of that being said, He’s certainly been better than Zach Wilson, and at least on par with Trevor Lawrence so I don’t understand the hyperbole mountaintop that you’re shouting down from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, stbugs said:

What a moron. Did Nagy watch how San Diego lost going for it on every 4th down? Chicago loses by 8 (7 really if they needed an XP) and decides to go for it 3 times. So, instead of having a 36, 31 and 26 yard FG attempts and being down by 5, they are down 14 and the last second TD just makes the score look not so bad instead of say, winning the game. Two games where the coaches were a combined 0-7 on 4th down and win if they just kick FGs.

Who is San Diego?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

No I would realize that he’s a rookie and works with a poo coach that doesn’t design the offense to his strengths. Even with all of that being said, He’s certainly been better than Zach Wilson, and at least on par with Trevor Lawrence so I don’t understand the hyperbole mountaintop that you’re shouting down from.

If you had that kind of patience, Trubisky would still be your QB and you’d likely be in the playoffs this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

No I would realize that he’s a rookie and works with a poo coach that doesn’t design the offense to his strengths. Even with all of that being said, He’s certainly been better than Zach Wilson, and at least on par with Trevor Lawrence so I don’t understand the hyperbole mountaintop that you’re shouting down from.

These takes about mobile QB's are all from the same playbook. They'll drag him for his completion percentage even though he's been a rookie learning on the fly but this same board made excuse after excuse for third year QB Darnold who has one of the league worst QBR and passer rating amongst starting quarterbacks. To have a young rookie with promise waiting would be a major boost for this franchise heading into next season but people who ridicule others for talking about it are just projecting. They know. They just can't admit it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

poo dude he looked pretty good last night, he needs to clean up the to's but I love his ability to run, throw on the run and be pinpoint accurate when he has time.  I would be super thrilled if I was a bears fan

If I had a dollar for every time I have heard similar words about an NFL quarterback, I would probably be a rich man.  Just about any NFL level quarterback can look good for a short time.  Sam Darnold looked good for a short time.  Even in Darnold's first season with the Jets, there were times people would say, if he can just clean up the turnovers, he is going to be great.  A few do clean it up, most do not.  If he can get to the point were he can look good consistently, and bad games become a rare thing, then he is a franchise qb.  Until that time though, he is just another guy with potential.  That is also true for Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson, Trey Lance, and Mack Jones.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...