Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anti Rhule sign at Buffalo Game (Tepper)


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Well that don’t sound good looks like we getting another year if Tepper really said that.

Yeah, that’s not good news.  Hopefully Tepper is just not showing his hand. If Rhule is here next season you might just see record low attendance at home games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ehh, that doesn't sound good at all.  I just have no idea what Tepper is thinking in keeping him...  so, chalk that up to not just two years wasted of fandom this year and last. But make it three with next season as well.

Oh well, I'll probably finish watching this season, but I won't be watching next if Rhule is still here.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ickmule said:

Yeah, that’s not good news.  Hopefully Tepper is just not showing his hand. If Rhule is here next season you might just see record low attendance at home games.  

I will be selling mine next year, idc if another teams fans gets them either. Tepper can suck my balls

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think evaluating QBs making the transition to the NFL is just a lot harder and more nuanced than draftniks make it out to be. That and the rookie wage scale means that if you don't have a franchise QB on the roster and you think this guy might be one you're almost forced to draft him now that you're protected from giving that guy a future HOFer type contract before he ever plays an NFL down. The expectation for mist of these guys to play right away is also not helping IMO.
    • Plenty of good teams made it to Super Bowls and some even won with meh QBs. Takes solid defense, good offensive planning and play calling and a helluva lot of magic. And I think the great QB elevating a team thing is overplayed too much. History just doesn't bear it out. Sure, it can lift a moderately good team like Mahomes did with the Chiefs, or Hurts did with the Eagles. And one can argue about Brady and the Pats (or even Bucs) but if you look at those Patriot and Buccaneer teams... there was something very solid in place already.  Heck, the whole idea that a single player can make or break an NFL team is vastly overplayed. The Cowboys have had a roster full of "star" players for decades now and have gotten bupkus in return. The Raiders have chased everything they could and have floundered mightily. The Giants have had star after star and nothing.  It's just hard to sell posters of a team. Give the marketing people a star though...
    • Seems you found the "exception" to the OP. Eli wasn't actually drafted by the Giants. But that's the only team he ever played for since he refused to go to San Diego. 
×
×
  • Create New...