Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reddit user says he has an “uncle that works for the team” and Rhule will be fired


FuFuLamePoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, BlitzMonster said:

This should be pretty easy to confirm.   Somebody on the Huddle has to be in real estate and could check this.  

This is all a matter of public record and can be found by searching the Register of Deeds website for Mecklenburg County, the tax records and then looking at Zillow.

After doing that, his house does not appear to be listed on the market right now.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

In the next two games?

We turned into that about four games ago.

I mean entire...as in every ounce of Panther football. We're almost there. Offense is consistent trash and ST are almost non existent. The defense atleast I can be half proud of. 

Even still... it could definitely get worse. Example: We basically got dog walked by Tampa playing the preseason squad....insert David and JPP + the 57% of offense they played without and things get a bit darker. 

This week we dont even have a center. The next two games will be very interesting. 

And I gotta beg the differ, the poo show started at the Giants imo. The saga continues though. The toilet is only getting smaller every Sunday.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

A guy said he pitched a fit about the meeting schedules because they didn’t fit methodically through his day so a bunch of groups had to change how they did things because the people he needed to meet with weren’t available at that time. Another example was that he walks around giving staff unwarranted advice and is extremely awkward and people ignore him. 

What a gigantic pile of steaming bovine dung that is....🤦‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Locally "we" were stuck on z-e-r-o "candid takes" before Tepper's arrival...

...and this remains the case.

No we used to get more info from reporters than we did in the past. I’m pretty sure Igo’s access has changed the past few years as an example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...