Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rank the 2022 QB Draft Class


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Who cares if a guy is a "reach" for a couple picks.  We're talking about taking a guy at 5 instead of 8 or something.  Just take the player you want and move on IMO.  No need to get cute.

A reach is when you take a 3rd round prospect in the top of the 2nd or something.

Yep just like last year folks on here were saying slater would be a reach at 8.  If you like him pick him.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:

None of them are a a top 10 pick but someone will reach for one. I don’t think but maybe 2 go in the first rd that’s how bad qb class is. Also we better not be one of them, we better be fixing oline.

If we could somehow get Neal in the first, and figure out a way to get back into the top of the second and snatch Willis or Strong that would be ideal. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WE NEED A fuging LINE. This draft works to our advantage. We need to bolster elsewhere and roll with what we got. Which means next year WON'T BE ANY BETTER EITHER, but maybe year 4. We surround Sam, Cam, Whoever back there with protection, it'll provide a chance for them to actually do something. We need to dangle CMC for picks, roll with Chuba, and build a damn line. NO SPLASHES

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People here still preaching about WE COULD HAVE HAD FIELDS, well HE'S BEEN GARBAGE. Any QB we reach for and throw into this dumpster fire is done. Fields would probably had been worse if we drafted him and threw him in there. We build that line, run ball control, let the defense flourish with a solid DT and MLB, we can compete for a playoff spot. But then again there's Rhule in there. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, joemac said:

If we could somehow get Neal in the first, and figure out a way to get back into the top of the second and snatch Willis or Strong that would be ideal. 

If Rhule is still our coach, I hope he isn’t allowed to give away any future draft capital. If he is here we will likely be picking in the top 10 next year. He already screwed this draft up with Darnold. We should be grabbing a top OL at 5/6 and then possibly a QB (Strong/Howell) in the second. Then more OL in the 3rd and so on… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RumHam said:

People here still preaching about WE COULD HAVE HAD FIELDS, well HE'S BEEN GARBAGE. Any QB we reach for and throw into this dumpster fire is done. Fields would probably had been worse if we drafted him and threw him in there. We build that line, run ball control, let the defense flourish with a solid DT and MLB, we can compete for a playoff spot. But then again there's Rhule in there. 

If we drafted Fields we would be using our draft to rebuild this OL while having a talented young QB to pair with an improved OL. We would just need a coach to be set. Seems like he is having a similar year as Lawrence, Wilson, any rookie not named Mac. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, joemac said:

If we could somehow get Neal in the first, and figure out a way to get back into the top of the second and snatch Willis or Strong that would be ideal. 

Neal will most likely be gone and the only way we move back into the top of the second is to trade next year’s first, DJ or Burns. Nobody wants CMC’s contract. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the exception of knowing our obvious needs and who we were talking to along the way, my question is this:  How did so many people start on this Jalon Walker frenzy?  I think this--everyone wants to have a voice, make a prediction.  Now with social media and 24 hour tv, networks, etc.  it is more like a middle school grapevine than it is a process where people actually dig for real evidence and reasons.  Speculative journalism is lazy, and since there are now 2,348.356 podcasters with basement studios blasting nonsense into our phones all day, I think they just cut and paste ideas.  Yes, coaches lie and mislead, but I don't think Morgan or Canales did.  You are only as reliable as your sources.  Was Morgan more deliberate this year?  I think he heard the gossip and decided to downplay WR.  He said, (paraphrasing) "We like our QB room.  We will probably add to it at some point."  Not a lie, but definitely downplaying things. I was convinced that we needed a blazer to keep safeties honest, but to be honest, I am not sure that we have the QB with the arm to keep safeties honest.  We have Coker who is 6'1", Theilen is 6'2", and Legette is 6'3" and now TMac is 6'4"+.  It seems size has more value than blazing deep speed.  If I had known they thought that, I might have gone with TMac all along--I thought he was not a good fit.  And if you look at the Panther guide and consider the talent they met with in the first round, there was only one offensive player--TMac. There was another quote that Morgan made that might have been a bit revealing or at least directive. (Paraphrasing) "We want players that were productive in college."  Well, TMac was very productive. In 2023 and in 2024, he averaged 108.8 yards per game.   He is also a great artist.  Drew this portrait of Bryce Young from memory: Many people spent 3 months absolutely confident that Jalon Walker would play edge here. We had a need at edge, but with Clowney, Wonnum, and Jones, were we OK if we drafted a second round Edge? Was Walker the answer?  Unlike Hunter, he is a versatile player who could be awesome in the right system, but if used as a pure edge, he is not a top 10 player.  I was convinced that we would sign Jalon and as much as I like the kid, I could not feel good about the pick.  Mykel Williams scared me.  Both might be great players, but I could not see it.  So was Scourton productive? He was as a Jr when he was standing.  When asked to be other things, he lost his edge (pun intended). In essence, I think we got the best pure edge when you take away the other things he was supposed to do.  Walker's productivity was based on his versatility--something he would lose as a pure edge--so we would not really be meeting needs at edge.  Scourton, on the other hand, is better when not asked to be versatile.  Princely had 10.5 sacks in the SEC.  It simply makes sense.
    • I think they will too. Renfrow will use this opportunity to get in shape and get paid for it. After he's cut he will probably get picked up by someone after preseason.
×
×
  • Create New...