Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Never would I have thought I would be begging for Richardson back.

Snake

By Snake,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Snake said:

JR was a bad owner who put himself and the NFL in front of the fans but my god Tepper has been horrible. Getting Tepper is like getting JR but with worse personal choices. JR would have never given Rhule that ridiculous contract and for that long and when coaches were horrible he cut them loose. We might not have liked Fox or Rivera but their performances are stellar compared to Rhule. But instead of cutting him out Tepper is doubling down with his bad idea and keeping him probably two more years unless we completely implode. What's worse is the message Tepper is sending out to the league. A message that he couldn't care about wins or the fans. Once you have sold him on your snake oil he will let the house burn before he admits it's not a cure. I question everything now. I'm pretty sure Morgan will be moving on after Teppers choices and probably no one who wants to win will stay. This isn't an environment of accountability and focus. It's an environment of yes sir and doing whats the easiest thing. That's why our coaches are soft and our team. 

Ok rant over... Not that my opinion or yours really matters anyway. 

...we were happy when his azz sold...only to have that turd hurney float to the top of the bowl....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted
Just now, rippadonn said:

Nope. I didn't. He has also made quite a few black men multi millionaires. He got Biakabatuka into the franchise and mentored him and many others, Moose, Steve.

he called a black scout the n-word. do you think that qualifies him as a racist?

he didn't make those black men millionaires, they made themselves millionaires by working for an employer who hired them so he could make billions off of their work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

he called a black scout the n-word. do you think that qualifies him as a racist?

he didn't make those black men millionaires, they made themselves millionaires by working for an employer who hired them so he could make billions off of their work.

Apparently is ok to call someone the n word so long as they’re compensated for their work, and the moral of that story is you made them wealthier.

JR is a piece of poo that would be behind bars if it weren’t for non disclosure contracts and a poo ton of money.

Not sure why people think he gets a pass.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

he called a black scout the n-word. do you think that qualifies him as a racist?

he didn't make those black men millionaires, they made themselves millionaires by working for an employer who hired them so he could make billions off of their work.

My point was that after they were let go he/they maintained a relationship and business relationships. A racist wouldn't do that.

You guys need to stop. Nobody is the perfect person. If I see a racist action on somebody's behalf, ok. 

As I said the real racists think about race constantly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted
Just now, rippadonn said:

My point was that after they were let go he/they maintained a relationship and business relationships. A racist wouldn't do that.

You guys need to stop. Nobody is the perfect person. If I see a racist action on somebody's behalf, ok. 

As I said the real racists think about race constantly. 

LOL

"he obviously didn't mind being called the n-word because he remained employed. you are the real racist"

eat your own poo

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...