Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kenny Pickett at 5/6


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Andy Dalton WAS better than Sam Darnold earlier in his career but at this point they both suck balls 

And Dalton folded in every wildcard trip, I'm over these prototypical mid ceiling game managers. Dunno how anyone could watch that Chiefs/Bills game and be excited about drafting Pickett thinking there is any way he could hang against either of those dudes

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I hope If we draft Pickett the first question a reporter asks is why they picked a guy with way below average hand size that can’t be overcome by technique but passed on slater because he has shorter arms that can be overcome by technique and just made 2nd team all pro. 

fair question 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I didn't realize his hands are reportedly 8 inches. 

That's not just below average, that may be the smallest  in prospect history and by a large margin.  I think there have been some in the high 8s but they're usually panned if they're low 9s for ball grip (I.E. Burrow).  That seems like a measurable if any, I imagine some teams may exclude him from their boards due to. 

He'll have NFL balls at his pro day.  So I imagine teams will be looking if that affects his throwing but it was mentioned in the other thread, holding onto the ball under duress then become an issue.  Particular because his footwork can get sloppy in those moments, the grip can only be so good at that length.  

Now that measurable is one that's harder to make up for versus arm length at LT.  His hand is 1/3.5ths of the circumference of the NFL ball.  

Interesting to say the least.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, davos said:

Something I didn't realize his hands are reportedly 8 inches. 

That's not just below average, that may be the smallest  in prospect history and by a large margin.  I think there have been some in the high 8s but they're usually panned if they're low 9s for ball grip (I.E. Burrow).  That seems like a measurable if any, I imagine some teams may exclude him from their boards due to. 

He'll have NFL balls at his pro day.  So I imagine teams will be looking if that affects his throwing but it was mentioned in the other thread, holding onto the ball under duress then become an issue.  Particular because his footwork can get sloppy in those moments, the grip can only be so good at that length.  

Now that measurable is one that's harder to make up for versus arm length at LT.  His hand is 1/3.5ths of the circumference of the NFL ball.  

Interesting to say the least.

I'll be shocked if his hands are only 8". I measures mine out of curiosity and they're just a shade under 9" and I would definitely struggle throwing a wet football.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

And Dalton folded in every wildcard trip, I'm over these prototypical mid ceiling game managers. Dunno how anyone could watch that Chiefs/Bills game and be excited about drafting Pickett thinking there is any way he could hang against either of those dudes

It's the potential of the unknown. Pickett made a big jump just like Joe Burrow. We don't know if Pickett can play in the NFL yet. We certainly do know that Darnold cannot. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'll be shocked if his hands are only 8". I measures mine out of curiosity and they're just a shade under 9" and I would definitely struggle throwing a wet football.

I wonder if it's a rumor blown out of proportion.  Maybe he's like slightly under 9/around 8.75ish.  I've considered myself fairly average 5'9 175 and just measured with the ruler, they're around 8.25 and I have never felt that comfortable with the football. I'd be surprised if they're really that small.  Plenty of dudes in the league are in the 7s but none are handlers of the ball.  Very rarely.  

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, davos said:

I wonder if it's a rumor blown out of proportion.  Maybe he's like slightly under 9/around 8.75ish.  I've considered myself fairly average 5'9 175 and just measured with the ruler, they're around 8.25 and I have never felt that comfortable with the football. I'd be surprised if they're really that small.  Plenty of dudes in the league are in the 7s but none are handlers of the ball.  Very rarely.  

So why the gloves then?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'll be shocked if his hands are only 8". I measures mine out of curiosity and they're just a shade under 9" and I would definitely struggle throwing a wet football.

Learned something new about my 39 year old body today. My left (non-dominant) hand is significantly bigger than my right hand. My right hand is a tad under 9". Call it 8 7/8s. My left hand is almost 9 1/4". I should've been left handed. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, davos said:

I wonder if it's a rumor blown out of proportion.  Maybe he's like slightly under 9/around 8.75ish.  I've considered myself fairly average 5'9 175 and just measured with the ruler, they're around 8.25 and I have never felt that comfortable with the football. I'd be surprised if they're really that small.  Plenty of dudes in the league are in the 7s but none are handlers of the ball.  Very rarely.  

I really doubt anyone has 7's. Are you measuring thumb to pinky and not wrist to middle finger? Even the smaller WR's usually are low 9's. Michael Vick is basically the most successful QB with 8.5" hands, had lots of fumbles but also lots of runs. Plenty of pocket fumbles though, guys just swiping at the ball

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, davos said:

I wonder if it's a rumor blown out of proportion.  Maybe he's like slightly under 9/around 8.75ish.  I've considered myself fairly average 5'9 175 and just measured with the ruler, they're around 8.25 and I have never felt that comfortable with the football. I'd be surprised if they're really that small.  Plenty of dudes in the league are in the 7s but none are handlers of the ball.  Very rarely.  

The rumor I’ve heard and what I think his agent put out is that he’s “double jointed in his thumb” so it doesn’t matter. That’s even more suspect to me lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...