Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on the OC search


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

 

When you don't have a qb who can pass the ball or an o line who has the ability to protect him, what is left ?

Well, he claims we are suppose to be building into something. 

the vision is apparently outdated football 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, ickmule said:

Please go away.  Please. 

He reminds me so much of my roommate’s Pomeranian-Chihuahua mix.  She’s always finding a way to get in my bed and bug the fug out of me at 7 AM when you simply want her to go.  the fug.  away.  The constant verbal diarrhea is also a troubling similarity, as well as spinning in circles while accomplishing nothing 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feel like me possibly could have a reverse BoB situation on our hands. Reverse because at least BoB had some success with the Texans he was just a terrible GM. But the ownership stubbornly didn't fire him when they should have and he destroyed the team in one offseason.

Now we have an owner who is stubbornly not firing a coach who has destroyed the team in one offseason, you could say it started in 2020 but it really came to a head in 2021. Rhule has had no success at the NFL level and now he wants to hire an OC to play outdated football that this team is not built to run.

I don't know what is gonna happen tomorrow, but how Rhule is talking sounds like nothing is gonna change and he is still gonna have too much control as he does now despite the product on the field being his creation.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

The number 1 seeds in both conferences are run first football teams. They use the run to set up the pass. 

It’s still a passing league.   Look at the Super Bowl winners and the playoffs in general. 

I wouldn’t call the Green Bay Packers a run first team.  

seems pointless not to build your team to take advantage of the rules and era you play in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

A wise man once said, "Sometimes, the answer is on your own roster."

I think he and Joe Judge are going to be fired tomorrow.

He needs to be fired immediately. His strategy could be to drag the process out long enough where all the good HC candidates fill the available vacancies and complete their staffs with the best coaches available. At that point, what’s Tepper going to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...