Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This can be a playoff team next year if we bring Cam back......


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Seeing as he fielded a 52 rating in the superbowl with better offensive talent than we have that’s an easy yes. No o line and it doesn’t matter who’s at wr or te 

and your argument is flaw seeing as numerous qbs have left one system and thrived in another

I mean you’re arguing from the null hypothesis that the current iteration of Cam Newton is as good (or better) than Pat Mahomes. That really says it all / I think we’re done here.

Edited by Borat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mainstream said:

Better than his MVP year with consistent protection + Moore, Robbie, CMC and a full preseason

Gotcha — all I needed to know. No real point in arguing when the baseline assessment is so disparate. No hard feelings and have a good night. 

Edited by Borat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Borat said:

I mean you’re arguing from the null hypothesis that the current iteration of Cam Newton is as good (or better) than Pat Mahomes. That really says it all / I think we’re done here.

Idk if you understand the point being made is no qb would succeed behind this o line, roster and coaching.No one is equating cam or any qb on the roster to Mahomes…….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Borat said:

Gotcha — all I needed to know. No real point in arguing when the baseline assessment is so disparate. No hard feelings and have a good night. 

Just keep in mind the only reason Carolina decided to cut Cam had nothing to do with performance, but his ability to stay healthy. He's healthy now and has been the last two seasons.

A healthy Cam putting up these numbers means something is very wrong besides Cam himself. It's ok, you'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Idk if you understand the point being made is no qb would succeed behind this o line, roster and coaching.No one is equating cam or any qb on the roster to Mahomes…….

Tony Romo said the same thing during the game last week. Yet people on here think QB is the problem, and want to draft one at 6. And are quick to blame Darnold, yet not Cam. And lets not forget that 2nd ranked defense giving up 23 points a game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cookinbrak said:

Tony Romo said the same thing during the game last week. Yet people on here think QB is the problem, and want to draft one at 6. And are quick to blame Darnold, yet not Cam. And lets not forget that 2nd ranked defense giving up 23 points a game.

You were on record loving the Darnold trade so ofc you are going to go to bat for him. That's sweet. He's still a bust and we need to draft our own QB this year or next regardless of Cam or PJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, frankw said:

You were on record loving the Darnold trade so ofc you are going to go to bat for him. That's sweet. He's still a bust and we need to draft our own QB this year or next regardless of Cam or PJ.

Do you have a car? Maybe you'll get one if you get a driver's license. But it doesn't matter what kind of engine it has if all of the tires are flat. And replacing the engine doesn't fix the tires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The focus on the Miami game is good and I will say it is a symptom of a few things.  The offensive line is bad, combine that with the fact that Miami knows Cam cannot throw the ball and sold out getting after Cam compounded the issues.  It is hilarious to see the same people that support Cam saying that nobody could be successful behind that line and then they say Darnold sucks.  Bottom line Darnold nor Cam are starters in this league.  Time to move on.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Do you have a car? Maybe you'll get one if you get a driver's license. But it doesn't matter what kind of engine it has if all of the tires are flat. And replacing the engine doesn't fix the tires.

Your attempts at insults are adorable. Bless your heart. Anywho yeah we know the oline needs to be addressed. That surely could have already been in progress if not for the bumbling of Matt Rhule and Scott Fitterer. But our awful passing didn't help matters and when your quarterback is fumbling and throwing interceptions and generally just playing terrible that only further helps defenses especially when they know said QB has very little deep pass accuracy to speak of. Neither of the top two quarterbacks from 2021 are the answer in that regard. This really isn't that difficult but we can help you if need be.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posters say darnold sucks cause we’re about to pay him 19 mil next season, we traded valuable picks for him and his decision making is horrible, all this while knowing he’s shown nothing to warrant the money nor picks and while being able to get better production from a guy off the couch.

guarantee if we didn’t trade nor pick up his 5th year option people wouldn’t be as down on him.

I’m definitely not sold on darnold being the answer even with a good o line but I can see that getting sacked 6-7 times in a game isn’t giving him a fair shot 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

If we fix the offensive line, and give Darnold more time to throw, he might set the franchise record for interceptions next year.  Most of his picks came when he had time to throw. On the flip side, he might have fewer fumbles.  

Exactly.  Yes the offensive line is hot trash.  But so is Sam Darnold.  Both things can be true.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's strange that you still can't see where I'm coming from, and I guarantee you don't have more faith in him than I do.  You're looking at him in a vacuum, not about the team around him and the likely offensive game plans this season. We're going to be a run first team with 3 receiving options better than any of the other players on past rookie 1k seasons. If you can't understand that, then it's a you problem, not a me problem. Arizona's previous basketball coach, Sean Miller, used to do something at the first team meeting of every season and I think it's soooooooooo applicable to this situation. He'd have every player right down how many minutes/points they expected to average that season and then he'd add them up.  It would show that if they all hit those numbers, we'd score like 125 points a game and need to be playing 7 guys at a time to get their minutes. That's pretty much how you guys are putting your T-Mac expectations out there, looking solely at the player and what you think he should be able to do, not how the offense will operate as a whole. Every yard one player gets is one less yard someone else can get.  It sounds like I just have more faith in Thielen, XL, and Coker this year than most everyone else.  But a big reason for that faith is because of T-Mac and how much he'll open things up for the rest of them and Bryce being the type of QB to take the open easy passes than force it to his #1. As I've said, if any one of the following happens... Thielen ends the season sub 700 yards, XL or Coker end up sub 500 yards... Then yes, I will then shift my expectations for T-Mac's rookie year to be at least 1,000 yard season. But since I have faith in those other 3 having solid seasons, it tempers my expectations yardage totals for T-Mac this year, and this year alone.  I've also clearly stated many times that I think he's going to reach 10 TDs. If T-Mac ends the season with 800 yards and 10 TDs, while Thielen gets 900-1,000 and XL/Coker each get around 600, I don't see any world where that is a failure for a rookie season for T-Mac. Because again, we're talking about expectations, not what is possible.  So given the other WR options, I can't EXPECT T-Mac to get to the 1k mark, which is a far cry from me saying I don't think he can get there. Do you really not see the difference there?  
    • I don't recall anyone seeing this coming.  I mean, two seperate things for me.  I thought BB just might not work in college football because he is old grumpy man and college is about appealing to young kids.   So yeah, that could of gone great or horrible.  Coin flip.  This isn't that convo for me.  what we are witnessing right now play out.....this was never part of the disaster possibility/path discussed lol.  Really weird stuff.  Or maybe I missed the part where UNC hires a 20 year old "girlfriend" that apparently runs the Bill operation and before the season even starts is taking over more than just Bill but influence of the entire UNC operation.  That was her getting that official statement made today.  It was her sabotaging the Hard Knocks UNC show because she somehow wasn't the star.  Seems like elder abuse lol.  Only largely kidding.  You even got Charles Barkley saying he normally doesn't talk about personal lives of his friends but he might have to check in on Bill because this ain't normal stuff lol.  Anyway, it's entertaining.  Everything is a cartoon it seems these days.   
    • I think its strange how you were claiming this guy was the second coming of Mike Evans and you can't even get behind 1k yards? I guess I have more faith in him than you
×
×
  • Create New...