Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adam Schaffer now singles out Matt Rhule as the only failing coach who hasn’t been fired, yet.


Julio
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Julio said:

One of the more damning things (out of MANY) on Matt Rhule was in the Person article a few weeks ago. This really is the lows of the lows for this team.

EF8F9603-D7FE-43FD-A42E-15C5624E9A6C.jpeg

Meanwhile our first order of business after another 5 win season was to get PJ Walker under a new contract.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s so panthers to keep a flailing HC while all other losing teams snatch up quality young coordinators. Only to fire rhule mid season next year and have no promising replacements available because they’re all head coaches already 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a stat yesterday where if the records were flipped by “team that scored first in games” we would be 12-5. First drives are scripted, and hell we look damn good in them. Just goes to show you we have the talent to be a good team, the lack of coaching adjustments throughout games to keep lifting that talent is obvious.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, countryboi said:

This tidbit under Schefter tweet is interesting

 

You can have a quick turnaround in the NFL if you know what you’re doing. Plenty of examples. 
 

the “program builder” I keep hearing for Rhule is fuging stupid and irrelevant. You don’t need four years to build poo in the NFL. That sort of logic applies to college football when a program like Temple or UNC Charlotte or ECU has nothing but time to let a guy come in and create something. Not in the pros. Win now or GTFO. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Meanwhile our first order of business after another 5 win season was to get PJ Walker under a new contract.

That was another kick in the balls. I like PJ and his attitude and he is an easy young man to pull for but he is NOT an NFL QB and if he starts more than an emergency one game for your team you are in serious trouble. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Julio said:

I saw a stat yesterday where if the records were flipped by “team that scored first in games” we would be 12-5. First drives are scripted, and hell we look damn good in them. Just goes to show you we have the talent to be a good team, the lack of coaching adjustments throughout games to keep lifting that talent is obvious.

The lack Of adjustments and playcalling tweaks after half time is the worst I’ve ever seen from a NFL coaching staff. I mean WTF you doing at half time because it sure as hell wasn’t your job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Julio said:

I saw a stat yesterday where if the records were flipped by “team that scored first in games” we would be 12-5. First drives are scripted, and hell we look damn good in them. Just goes to show you we have the talent to be a good team, the lack of coaching adjustments throughout games to keep lifting that talent is obvious.

Good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Julio said:

I saw a stat yesterday where if the records were flipped by “team that scored first in games” we would be 12-5. First drives are scripted, and hell we look damn good in them. Just goes to show you we have the talent to be a good team, the lack of coaching adjustments throughout games to keep lifting that talent is obvious.

If my aunt had a one eyed trouser snake she would be my uncle 

Edited by 4Corners
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

the “program builder” I keep hearing for Rhule is fuging stupid and irrelevant.

I cringed every time I saw someone using the word "program" to describe the Panthers. Worst team in the league with very little real NFL experience on staff. Who could have predicted this right?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Manna said:

Lighten up. With Rhule returning we have a great opportunity to land the No.1 overall pick in the 2023 draft. Too bad this isn't madden where we can just sim the season and not have to sit through it. 

Defense is good enough to win enough games to not be worse than the Jags/Jets unfortunately.  Top 3 maybe but not bad enough to be Top Overall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

I cringed every time I saw someone using the word "program" to describe the Panthers. Worst team in the league with very little real NFL experience on staff. Who could have predicted this right?

I agree the program builder is a stupid thing to say here it’s apples and oranges. These are paid professionals who need adequate coaching and game planning. Not 18 year old kids you can boss around and threaten to send home to mommy and daddy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

the “program builder” I keep hearing for Rhule is fuging stupid and irrelevant. You don’t need four years to build poo in the NFL. That sort of logic applies to college football when a program like Temple or UNC Charlotte or ECU has nothing but time to let a guy come in and create something. Not in the pros. Win now or GTFO. 

Yes.  It's been a headscratcher that seemingly smart people keep referencing the year 3 turnaround. It works in college because you need time for your recruits right out of high school to catch up and compete with 22 year old 5th year seniors. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Manna said:

Lighten up. With Rhule returning we have a great opportunity to land the No.1 overall pick in the 2023 draft. Too bad this isn't madden where we can just sim the season and not have to sit through it. 

except that we won't get first pick. we'll win games...early on in the season and then we drop off the cliff. 

we're looking at a consistent 4-5 win coach.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...