Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LaCanfora asks evaluators about Pickett...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

Yep. Watch the screen routes they called. He would literally stare down the back, pat the ball to steady himself, then shove it toward the back like he’s playing a backyard pickup game. Y’all think he’s gonna be able to misdirect all pro linebackers when it takes him an extra 1-1.5 seconds to get a throw off? No way. He’s going to be a turnover machine and the playbook is gonna be crazy limited. 
 

You know who his comp is? Jake Frohm. This would be like us drafting Jake Frohm in the top 10. 

Another comment here the Senior Bowl is very scripted to showcase the players.  Always has been.  If Kenny Pickett does not go through the entire, I mean entire combine activities that would another huge flag for me.  I can see him skipping out.  

The combine isn’t a huge deal overall but it does show competitive nature.  None of the top players should be worried about what the combine brings to light.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Naw you are a pick OL guy right?  Small test to see of you can respond without a Matt Rhule comment.  lol

This team lives or dies in their decision to keep Rhule. Nothing they do matters if he is coach because the outcome is going to be the same. I'd like the team to go OL, but I don't trust Rhule to make good choices or run the team wisely. It doesn't matter who position coaches or coordinators are because this is Rhule's team. They're going to roll with Pickett or something dumb like a CB or if they pick an OT, he'll be the next Greg Little. Why? Because this is Rhule's team and he doesn't know what the fug he's doing. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

This team lives or dies in their decision to keep Rhule. Nothing they do matters if he is coach because the outcome is going to be the same. I'd like the team to go OL, but I don't trust Rhule to make good choices or run the team wisely. It doesn't matter who position coaches or coordinators are because this is Rhule's team. They're going to roll with Pickett or something dumb like a CB or if they pick an OT, he'll be the next Greg Little. Why? Because this is Rhule's team and he doesn't know what the fug he's doing. 

Love ya Razor…lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Shocker said:

Agree, but Jake Frohm played better comp in college and was more accomplished.  LOL

I said he was Blaine Gabbert but I probably shouldn’t disrespect Blaine that way

Gabbert is actually a really good comp. Wide open offense. “Prototype pocket passer” coming out with a ton of questions about if he had peaked. Good but not great athletically. Did he make good decisions or did the offense make good decisions for him? Same thing here. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Shocker said:

Another comment here the Senior Bowl is very scripted to showcase the players.  Always has been.  If Kenny Pickett does not go through the entire, I mean entire combine activities that would another huge flag for me.  I can see him skipping out.  

The combine isn’t a huge deal overall but it does show competitive nature.  None of the top players should be worried about what the combine brings to light.

Not to mention he sat out a huge bowl game opportunity. I mean if he goes out there and shreds Michigan State then I would have had a lot more respect for him. Maybe still not top 10 respect. But if he goes 30/45, 300+ and 2-3 TDs on MSU then Im at least not laughing at a team taking him top 10. 
 

Everyone comparing him to Burrow needs to remember that JB went for 450 yards and 3 TDs and put up 46 on Bama. He didn’t opt out of any games….

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Saying he’s the best of this class isn’t saying much. There isn’t one qb this year who anyone can flat out say he’s going to succeed. We would be better off getting a FA and fortifying our line. Then hope we suck bad enough to pick top 3 next year.

We would be but not Rhule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...