Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How far would the Stafford led Panthers have gone?


 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

We would have made the playoffs I think 9-8. There were 3 to 4 games where we had good qb play we would have been ok.


Eagles not having Darius Slay be the best receiver.

Vikings that opening drive

NE the pick 6 

New Orleans part 2 

just to name a few.

If Stafford could stay healthy, I agree. 8-9 wins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

We would have made the playoffs I think 9-8. There were 3 to 4 games where we had good qb play we would have been ok.


Eagles not having Darius Slay be the best receiver.

Vikings that opening drive

NE the pick 6 

New Orleans part 2 

just to name a few.

If Stafford could stay healthy, I agree. 8-9 wins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Stafford is better than average, but he's still a bum.

Incorrect, he proved a lot of people wrong who believed he was the problem in Detroit.

 But just as in Detroit he wouldnt be good enough to carry a  a bad team and even worse coaching staff if he were here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, saX man said:

If we were shunned by FAs last year (including Stafford), we’ll be like canvassers getting the door slammed on them this offseason seeking decent free agents. 

We are twirling down the porcelain passageway folks.

Yep, going to be even harder to get quality FAs this year. Bottom feeders we are.....yet again. Yay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Incorrect, he proved a lot of people wrong who believed he was the problem in Detroit.

 But just as in Detroit he wouldnt be good enough to carry a  a bad team and even worse coaching staff if he were here. 

Thats my point.  He is above average and was on a ridiculous team.  My idea of franchise QBs are guys that elevate everyone around them and make their team better and can carry them to victory if no one else can.  Stafford isn't that.  He needs the guys around him to do a lot of the carrying. 

He's better than average, but he isn't what people have tried to make him out to be.  He almost blew that game had the officials not stepped in late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lmao that's a good point; but at the same time I think and HOPE Canales learned from how he operated last year, only giving us one real look against the Bills that had people shouting 'Super Bowl'...only to come out flat.
    • I mean the whole defense was trash, he was at least trying. Besides if you put a all-pro among 10 PSers, that all-world will look human. It's very hard to judge very bad units and find the best players among them. Horn and Mjack played well too, there was 0 pass rush and -1777784 run defense. 
    • I was looking back and seen Evan Neal has made the switch to OG after awful years at OT.......I wanted him over Icky for his tricep alone..... I was 100% stroud too, I was super pissed about his record setting and playoff leading start......I had arich vastly over the midget BY too. But right now, BY is about the only one on the up&up. The Texans used lots of prime draft capital to help Stroud.  It's still not ready. But if you're honestly about past drafts, these GMs are not alone in making mistakes.  I still feel they should stayed put and allowed Carter to fall in their lap, but best I know Tepper had the worst rage about landing a QB for the past 5 years. The deal is with the correct coaching staff, Baker or darnold would still be here....Baker has signed 3 years for 100 million, which is a great NFL QB contract. Tepper hiring rhule and his shitty Baylor/temple staff was a massive setback given rhule was in control too. Then panic set in an d fitteerererererer had to make a winner and find a QB. Ugh.....I hope they are back... 
×
×
  • Create New...