Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OL vs QB, be carefull what you wish for


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Jet fans probably said the same thing about hoping to get something in a trade for him.

Maybe its not resigning Sam, but signing some midlevel vet.  The point is still the same, for all the people hoping to wait a year to draft a QB.  We could potentially improve the team enough where we don't' end up drafting a QB in 2023.

While possible I just don't see it. Not after how badly our last two attempts have gone. The benefits of a young quarterback with potential on an affordable rookie deal are being utilized more and more by teams who are having varying levels of success. If this regime is truly into the analytics they have rambled on about then I firmly believe we will see a rookie quarterback this year or next. People can say we could make a run at Watson or one of the other top tier quarterbacks but if it boils down to it I can say with near certainty they will choose a bigger market and better situation overall. If Rhule and Fitterer have any clue at all they will know by now what has to be done. Of course that’s the rub and why so many are now pessimistic. We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

Your premise is flawed, it’s centered around the idea that a team makes a QB, and not that a QB makes a team. We’ve seen more than enough evidence to prove that. A franchise QB is going to bring out a lot of positives, and diminish and a lot of flaws. Saying you don’t see a “franchise QB” in this class is not only subjective, it’s irrelevant. 
 

Drafting a QB in the top 10 is about as good of odds you’re going to get on finding a franchise guy, and if he flops extraordinary, then you’re in a position to take another guy. Either is preferable to the idea of “building around the QB” or “leaning on the run game” that so many here have so many nostalgic memories of and long to see replicated, because you’re just going to end up picking 10 or 15 or 19 or 21 year in and year out and likely out of reach for what it takes to build a team that can contend for a super bowl-a Quarterback.

also, “make much positive impact on the 2022 season”

who cares? What does this mean? The point of the draft isn’t about “making a positive impact on the current season.”

it’s about evaluating opportunity cost relative to impact over the course of the next 10 seasons. 

Lol, what are you even arguing? If you want to live in fantasy land, I said I can respect your choice. The rest is really not worth the time. Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of IFs in this equation.  Too many to really break down the possibilities. 

It really all boils down to this.  IF the tea leaves all lined up and we had nearly the best possible outcome, that shifts where the focus goes to try and reach the next level.  IF an improved Darnold is decent enough to get us to 9 wins but no further, that should be relatively obvious.  The only additional IF is whether the organization wants to get to the next level or it is content winning 7-11 games every year (2 either side of what was proposed). 

IF the answer to that last IF is they are satisfied being a consistent playoff contender/entrant but not getting to the next level, they run with Darnold.  IF they want to get to the next level, they pull an LA Rams and try to trade for an existing QB that can get them to the next level, or a KC (and maybe SF) and trade up in the draft to grab whoever has caught their eye at the QB position and see what happens.  Both models can work, one just potentially mortgages more of the future (if nothing else, it costs more of the salary cap) than the other. 

But again, all that is based on everything else aligning almost perfectly.  Almost everything regressed last year.  As BlitzMonster said, IF somehow all that happened my opinion of Rhule would change because it would mean he actually learned and adapted.  Or he got extremely lucky, but if that was the case he should be buying lottery tickets while on that roll.  I don't see that happening, but it is not an impossibility.  Just highly improbable.  Probably not as improbable as all the other IFs materializing, but improbable nonetheless.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Lol, what are you even arguing? If you want to live in fantasy land, I said I can respect your choice. The rest is really not worth the time. Cheers.

You could’ve just said, “yeah, you’re right “ I wouldn’t have thought less of you for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OP isn’t saying we pay Sam to a huge deal. If Sam plays serviceable and our team is improving there us a chance he could get signed to an average contract. It would also put us out of range for Young/Stroud/and other top prospect.  We could basically become what the Colts are. Is that good or bad? I’m not sure…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, onmyown said:

As much as I hate the qb moves made so far, really the only opportunity to get one in the past several years was Herbert, and no one really knows how feasible that was.

There was Lamar Jackson if the FO had the foresight to see Cam was done. But we did still have Cam.

Corse this is based on Fields and Jones not working out which I find hard to fathom.

And no I’m not considering FAs since they laugh when they hear the Panthers.

Building a stout team first or until the opportunity arises isn’t exactly a bad plan, nor a disproven blue print. The problem is if you’re not finding a qb you can’t be doing dumb poo (trading for Darnold, amateur drafts moves) and you actually have to be building that stout team.

The Panthers aren’t doing that. In fact I’d argue they’re regressing.

You actually make a good point, look at the past 10 drafts and when we picked, how many chances did we really have for a QB.  You can't really count Herbert because he went before us, no idea how much a trade up would have been.

We could have had Lamar or Mahomes or Watson, but there are plenty of years where we really not in a position to take a QB that has turned out to be good.  This is why this idea of building a team and finding a QB when it is convenient is laughable

QBs are the hardest part of the puzzle to find, if you think you have a chance to draft one you like you do it.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

See fantasy lol. Have fun chasing unicorns.

It’s okay, I get it. A lot of fans just like being along for the ride, and that’s okay. Big picture conceptual discussions or draft philosophy that is more complex than “just coming away with a good player” is a lot like witchcraft to these individuals. No shame in it man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

For all those that want OL instead of QB, which is a valid thought, what if:

We draft a LT that plays well his first year

BC moves to guard and plays well

Our new OL coach, who has a great reputation, helps improve the rest of the line.

Our WR core plays up to their potential.

CMC comes back healthy and stays that way.

Our new OC helps Sam improve.

Horn comes back healthy.  

The other young guys on defense continue to improve.

We go 9-8 and 

Tepper decides to keep Rhule 

and we 

Resign Sam

Sometimes you have to be careful what you wish for in life.

Honestly by being greedy and waiting to get a new QB we actually might increase our chances of not getting a rookie QB at all.

 

 

We all agree we need QB and OL... I am of the opinion you cant truly see what you have at QB if the OL is nearly if not the worst in the league.. What I would like to see is sign OL help in the FA market, trade down in the 1st and sign someone like Ritter, or for all we know, Corral or Willis could be there. But I am 1000% on board with getting the OL fixed first. While this board is made up of opinions, I'll just throw this out there... SIGN FA TRUBISKY, draft OL, S, and LB help. See what happens... I think Trubisky beats Darnold out for the starting job, we have a QB who is still fairly young in Trubisky. Draft QB next year to groom after getting everything else fixed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think institutional accountability is a really important philosophy for any large organization.

Rhule pushed all his chips in with Sam Darnold.  Now Tepper has to hold Rhule accountable for that decision with Darnold starting in 2022.  

If Darnold falls on his face (a fairly good chance of that happening) then Rhule has to pay the consequences for his decision -  which means being fired.

No going after other free agent QB's this year.   No drafting a QB with pick #6.  Play the guy you wanted and let the chips fall where they may.  

That's what it means to be responsible for your decisions.  

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BlitzMonster said:

I think institutional accountability is a really important philosophy for any large organization.

Rhule pushed all his chips in with Sam Darnold.  Now Tepper has to hold Rhule accountable for that decision with Darnold starting in 2022.  

If Darnold falls on his face (a fairly good chance of that happening) then Rhule has to pay the consequences for his decision -  which means being fired.

No going after other free agent QB's this year.   No drafting a QB with pick #6.  Play the guy you wanted and let the chips fall where they may.  

That's what it means to be responsible for your decisions.  

so, you sacrifice a year for the fans and the other 52 players on the team to prove a point to Rhule?

If you feel that strongly you should have fired him already.

I do agree though that if Tepper I'm not going to let him do something drastic such as spending a bunch of draft capital to move up or to overpay for a QB in free agency, but if there is a logical upgrade I'm not going to forego it just to prove a point.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

The only way we would resign Sam Darnold is if he throws for over 4k yards and 30+ TDs and less than 10 TOs.  If that happened, our OC would be gone after this year for another HC gig. 

This is exactly what Rhule envisioned happening last year and the Media was totally buying into it after our first 3 games. Everyone was talking about Golden Boy Joe Brady and him leaving and becoming the next Sean McVay. Funny how quickly things changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AU-panther said:

For all those that want OL instead of QB, which is a valid thought, what if:

We draft a LT that plays well his first year

BC moves to guard and plays well

Our new OL coach, who has a great reputation, helps improve the rest of the line.

Our WR core plays up to their potential.

CMC comes back healthy and stays that way.

Our new OC helps Sam improve.

Horn comes back healthy.  

The other young guys on defense continue to improve.

We go 9-8 and 

Tepper decides to keep Rhule 

and we 

Resign Sam

Sometimes you have to be careful what you wish for in life.

Honestly by being greedy and waiting to get a new QB we actually might increase our chances of not getting a rookie QB at all.

 

 

In this scenario Sam would have trade value and we’re finally in a Position to trade multiple firsts like the 49ers to move up for our QB 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...