Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have reached out to Minnesota for Kirk Cousins


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

They'd absolutely have to renegotiate that, which would possibly mean extending him.

They would have to give him a 5 year deal.  Godalmighty this is just not good.  Not good at all.  I wish some of the dudes advocating for him would just do a minimum bit of research and see how shitty this dude is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Cousins is a nightmare scenario because he’s good enough to be around .500 and take us out of contention for a top rookie QB.

I’d rather stick with Darnold and tank or even draft Pickett because at least a rookie could morph into something unexpected sometimes. 

Mannnnnnn this is what I've been trying to get through to all these people rage posting about Pickett or whichever QB in this draft. We are not tanking. We've drafted two first round QB's in a quarter century. Sometimes you just have to accept circumstances and roll the dice.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He is due 45 million dollars in 2022.  And some on here want this.  Godalmighty

Any trade would obviously come with the Vikings paying a large portion of his salary. Come on man, I thought you were a GM in the making. These are basic things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

If we were able to trade for Cousins without sacrificing the #6 pick, a pairing of Cousins and Pickett would be possible.

Wouldn't call that likely, but it's possible.

Get cousins, keep #6 and draft a QB to ride the pine for a year and then spend rest of money on OL and filling gaps of who leaves. Still not enough prob overcome Rhule’s deficiencies but this team would be competitive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Mannnnnnn this is what I've been trying to get through to all these people rage posting about Pickett or whichever QB in this draft. We are not tanking. We've drafted two first round QB's in a quarter century. Sometimes you just have to accept circumstances and roll the dice.

I agree.  If he's Johnny Manziel then pick up the dice and roll again next year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

They would have to give him a 5 year deal.  Godalmighty this is just not good.  Not good at all.  I wish some of the dudes advocating for him would just do a minimum bit of research and see how shitty this dude is

I posted his career stats earlier. “Shitty” is not at all what jumps off the page at you. 

He’s got better stats than Stafford over the past 5 or 6 years and absolutely nobody would have a problem with Stafford, even though he never won a damn thing until this year. 

Edited by joemac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...