Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitchell Trubisky is the best play


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Hey dude I agree w most of your posts/opinions but that is really lame of you to call me a troll because you know I’m not one.
 

Sure, I’m guilty of making a “troll” ish post every now and then for shits and giggles like 95% of the people on here but I’ve been posting since sitting in my dorm in 2006-2007 and I can assure you I don’t really care that much to deliberately log on here and try and get banned or talk poo on the internet. 
 

 

In regards to college sports, yeah bro you're pretty trolly. You rarely miss a chance to take a swipe at another local school or over the top praise a former Heel.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2022 at 7:29 AM, electro's horse said:

Mitchell "titty kisser" Trubisky is the best play for the Carolina Panthers in 2022. It is not a perfect situation, but you play the cards you're dealt. 

 

Stop right there.  No need to do anything else. Let Matt Rhule play the cards he dealt. Trade no one, sign no one. Lock it down, cut your losses. Just get your GM to draft needs other than a qb.

 

To me, that is playing the cards you are dealt. Trying to bring other qbs, trading for players using future picks at this point is playing another hand. Let the new regime do that after the coming year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PeteRozelle said:

Stop right there.  No need to do anything else. Let Matt Rhule play the cards he dealt. Trade no one, sign no one. Lock it down, cut your losses. Just get your GM to draft needs other than a qb.

 

To me, that is playing the cards you are dealt. Trying to bring other qbs, trading for players using future picks at this point is playing another hand. Let the new regime do that after the coming year.

i mean, yeah

but sending darnold back out there, improved line or not, is telling the fans, coaches, and players that you have no intention of winning games this year. that we're just going to see if rhule can make a miracle happen, and if not he's fired 1 minutes into the team's bye week.

not sure how realistic that it is but i'd be all for it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

i mean, yeah

but sending darnold back out there, improved line or not, is telling the fans, coaches, and players that you have no intention of winning games this year. that we're just going to see if rhule can make a miracle happen, and if not he's fired 1 minutes into the team's bye week.

not sure how realistic that it is but i'd be all for it

With Rhule still retaining power, probably not at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You just don't see the same visceral reaction when an NCSU player is brought up. If there's an NCSU player who can help us out, hell yeah! Bring him in. But a UNC player gets brought up and the ABCers complain for pages on end about how these imaginary UNC fanboys are ruining the forum. 😂

Yea I don't remember screams for Mario Williams, Philip Rivers, Russ, etc...

UNC fans are rabid in this state.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Yea I don't remember screams for Mario Williams, Philip Rivers, Russ, etc...

UNC fans are rabid in this state.

Who here is "screaming" for Trubisky? You're imagining this. We've been in "throw mud at the wall" mode at QB for years now. This is just a throw mud at the wall thread but that's enough to trigger the ABCers 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Who here is "screaming" for Trubisky? You're imagining this. We've been in "throw mud at the wall" mode at QB for years now. This is just a throw mud at the wall thread but that's enough to trigger the ABCers 

I'm not saying they are, but UNC players do tend to get talked about a lot on here...more than NCSU by a pretty wide margin.

In ENC, almost every single person you meet from here is a Carolina fan...most have never stepped foot on the campus, I was wondering if it was like that all over the US with other teams and states or if NC is special because we have produced so many great BB runs over the past 20 years.

I see that same fan spillover here with players.  A good friend of mine from here, graduated from Clemson, so did his wife, also from here....DIEHARD UNC Fans...for no real reason.  I find it odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you guys haven't figured it out yet, no matter whoever Rhule brings in it will be the wrong guy.  You can argue over who would be the best choice all you want. It will not matter.  He could sign Tom Brady and somehow it would end in disaster.  Not to mention whoever it is will cost us dearly, even scrub FA's.

Face it people we are cursed with that guy calling the shots.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...